Already gave you the legal definition of immigration, good job going full retard. The only thing you have is an ego so large you believe it supersedes all reality.
I guess you finally realized how stupid your "Congress would need to pass a constitutional amendment if the asylum treaty was abrogated" was.
No, thatβs completely true. Again, legal definitions have basis. I get retarded sperging and ego stroking is all you have.
You contradict yourself then claim Iβm the one with no legal knowledge. Absolutely hilarious and proving youβre a shitlib time after time after time.
Yup, none at all. I didn't want to insult you. I also could have said a middle school student. It's just beyond stupid to believe that you'd need a constitutional amendmnet to allow refugees in the absence of a refugee treaty.
You couldnβt even get out of your own way enough to the point you said legal definitions werenβt real. They would! If you actually read the Constitution, or anything instead of your ego, you would realize this.
Already gave you the legal definition of immigration, good job going full retard. The only thing you have is an ego so large you believe it supersedes all reality.
No, thatβs completely true. Again, legal definitions have basis. I get retarded sperging and ego stroking is all you have.
The legal definition? No such thing. Also, legal definitions don't travel back in time, in case you didn't know.
Have you spoken a first-year law student yet?
It's literally retarded. It's so dumb that I feel bad for mocking you for believing that, because it's like I'm beating up a cripple.
ππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ
You contradict yourself then claim Iβm the one with no legal knowledge. Absolutely hilarious and proving youβre a shitlib time after time after time.
Yup, none at all. I didn't want to insult you. I also could have said a middle school student. It's just beyond stupid to believe that you'd need a constitutional amendmnet to allow refugees in the absence of a refugee treaty.
You couldnβt even get out of your own way enough to the point you said legal definitions werenβt real. They would! If you actually read the Constitution, or anything instead of your ego, you would realize this.