Sometimes I reply to her just to see which way the worm will turn. The way she pivots to natalism belies the desire to overturn society in the manner that communism always seeks.
What a strange false dichotomy. The biggest reason is because it makes it harder for a new aristocracy to supplant an existing one if society is cohesive.
Wanting more families and children pre-dates Marx by millennia.
"The first bond of society is the marriage tie; the next our children; then the whole family of our house, and all things in common." - Marcus Tullius Cicero
Right, and name an ideology that suggested taxing everyone else to give it to families. That didn't happen. If you couldn't afford to raise your kids, they'd die and so would you.
Natalism is anti-human. An idea that enables all the worst of society.
Nice bit of inversion there. Never mind that the working class is taxed so hard and society has been so twisted by feminism that young men can't even afford to start a family. And what color are those multi-generational families collecting so much money without ever having a job?
And did the communists actually give it to those families? Or did it all go to military spending and weapons projects that were ultimately useless anyway?
It's such a shame natalism is so effective at ending societies. If only the ancient Greeks, Romans and all those other civilizations just killed all the women and stopped giving a shit about children.
But oh well, at least in the matriarchy we'll just have to subsidize single women's abortions and bad lifestyle choices instead of entire families. Blue wave 2026!
How are you not pro commie?
Imp isn't consistent about any positions. Just the other day she was even defending Trump after being talked in a circle.
Sometimes I reply to her just to see which way the worm will turn. The way she pivots to natalism belies the desire to overturn society in the manner that communism always seeks.
I defended Trump because your position was retarded, not because I suddenly like him.
He's pro feminism too.
His only guiding consistent idea is his hatred for white men.
Most women are pro feminist, so it's really no surprise. And no, you can't convince me Imp is not female
How is natalism not communism?
Comrade, you are one man, you only need one room! We take house and give to family! More babies for the state!
The most important freedom is the freedom to make decisions that don't favor the interests of the state. If you can't do that, you aren't free.
What a strange false dichotomy. The biggest reason is because it makes it harder for a new aristocracy to supplant an existing one if society is cohesive.
Wanting more families and children pre-dates Marx by millennia.
"The first bond of society is the marriage tie; the next our children; then the whole family of our house, and all things in common." - Marcus Tullius Cicero
Right, and name an ideology that suggested taxing everyone else to give it to families. That didn't happen. If you couldn't afford to raise your kids, they'd die and so would you.
Natalism is anti-human. An idea that enables all the worst of society.
Nice bit of inversion there. Never mind that the working class is taxed so hard and society has been so twisted by feminism that young men can't even afford to start a family. And what color are those multi-generational families collecting so much money without ever having a job?
And did the communists actually give it to those families? Or did it all go to military spending and weapons projects that were ultimately useless anyway?
It's such a shame natalism is so effective at ending societies. If only the ancient Greeks, Romans and all those other civilizations just killed all the women and stopped giving a shit about children.
But oh well, at least in the matriarchy we'll just have to subsidize single women's abortions and bad lifestyle choices instead of entire families. Blue wave 2026!