You didn't used to bother with that. You never had a problem blaming it all on women regardless of who was in charge before. You'd engage in the most pretzeled logic in order to lay it all at the feet of women. So what changed?
What changed was the large increase in noticing. Imp then povited to attacking any hint of positive white identity, although he usually couches it in anti-woman or anti-family terms in order to obfuscate his obvious (((agenda))). Observe how he has nothing to say about the far more expensive and destructive reproductive behavior of nonwhites. No, imp reserves all of his anti-natalism venom for the one racial demographic that actually pays for its own children.
You didn't used to bother with that. You never had a problem blaming it all on women regardless of who was in charge before. You'd engage in the most pretzeled logic in order to lay it all at the feet of women. So what changed?
What changed was the large increase in noticing. Imp then povited to attacking any hint of positive white identity, although he usually couches it in anti-woman or anti-family terms in order to obfuscate his obvious (((agenda))). Observe how he has nothing to say about the far more expensive and destructive reproductive behavior of nonwhites. No, imp reserves all of his anti-natalism venom for the one racial demographic that actually pays for its own children.
He was already attacking any and all hints of positive White identity prior to his natalism kick, so there must be something else in this equation.
Because the current leadership decided people who avoid women are their enemy.
We will not comply.
I think you've simply lost the plot. Are you really Imp?
Do you have an argument or just insults?
When have arguments ever had an effect on you?
Irony.