So, let me get this straight. The rest of society funds everything for families, so they can then hoard that wealth from everyone else, with no hint of irony about their own parasitism?
There is no such thing as "Hoarding Wealth", that's communist speak. It's the voice of envy.
Just because one person has more doesn't mean anyone else has less due to that.
A thriving economy isn't a zero-sum game where one person's gain must equal another's loss, because wealth, goods, and services can be created.
It's not envy. We fucking funded the existence of the children they couldn't afford to have. At the very fucking least, they should pay back society.
But it is a zero sum game. Taxes are increased in targeted ways to attack those without families, on the demand of those with families. It stopped being fair when they started deliberately targeting us out of spite. Now we deserve a refund.
I don't know what pot you're smoking, but everything in my life has been taxed. I do enjoy some public benefits like parks and roads, but the cost of upkeep for those is a fraction of a percent of what I've paid into the feds.
So, let me get this straight. The rest of society funds everything for families, so they can then hoard that wealth from everyone else, with no hint of irony about their own parasitism?
Yea but I’m not entitled to someone’s wealth. If somebody wants to pass on money to children then fine.
But they seem to think they're entitled to ours, with their constant push to tax us higher because we don't have kids.
Why the fuck should we just take it? We should declare them our enemy and unite to get back what's ours.
There is no such thing as "Hoarding Wealth", that's communist speak. It's the voice of envy.
Just because one person has more doesn't mean anyone else has less due to that. A thriving economy isn't a zero-sum game where one person's gain must equal another's loss, because wealth, goods, and services can be created.
It's not envy. We fucking funded the existence of the children they couldn't afford to have. At the very fucking least, they should pay back society.
But it is a zero sum game. Taxes are increased in targeted ways to attack those without families, on the demand of those with families. It stopped being fair when they started deliberately targeting us out of spite. Now we deserve a refund.
None of what you describes is part of a zero-sum economic policy. and you fundamentally don't understand how tax policies and subsidies work.
RealWildRanter alt.
It's not literally zero sum, but it might as well be. The more families expand, the bigger the burden on the rest of us.
I don't know what pot you're smoking, but everything in my life has been taxed. I do enjoy some public benefits like parks and roads, but the cost of upkeep for those is a fraction of a percent of what I've paid into the feds.
Families are around 50% of the total welfare burden.
Why do we have to fund people having kids they can't afford?