There is no such thing as "Hoarding Wealth", that's communist speak. It's the voice of envy.
Just because one person has more doesn't mean anyone else has less due to that.
A thriving economy isn't a zero-sum game where one person's gain must equal another's loss, because wealth, goods, and services can be created.
It's not envy. We fucking funded the existence of the children they couldn't afford to have. At the very fucking least, they should pay back society.
But it is a zero sum game. Taxes are increased in targeted ways to attack those without families, on the demand of those with families. It stopped being fair when they started deliberately targeting us out of spite. Now we deserve a refund.
There is no such thing as "Hoarding Wealth", that's communist speak. It's the voice of envy.
Just because one person has more doesn't mean anyone else has less due to that. A thriving economy isn't a zero-sum game where one person's gain must equal another's loss, because wealth, goods, and services can be created.
It's not envy. We fucking funded the existence of the children they couldn't afford to have. At the very fucking least, they should pay back society.
But it is a zero sum game. Taxes are increased in targeted ways to attack those without families, on the demand of those with families. It stopped being fair when they started deliberately targeting us out of spite. Now we deserve a refund.
None of what you describes is part of a zero-sum economic policy. and you fundamentally don't understand how tax policies and subsidies work.
RealWildRanter alt.
It's not literally zero sum, but it might as well be. The more families expand, the bigger the burden on the rest of us.