Wouldn't people just be moving away from SATA SSDs because those M.2 NVMe SSDs or whatever they're called, the ones shaped like a rectangular wafer, seem superior in practically every way? Aren't there are also PCIe SSDs, at the very least, from Intel? (Edit: After a quick search, they appear to have been yet another long gone trend, another Intel thing that failed. The Intel 750 series were SSDs that plugged into graphics card slots.)
I don't like SATA at all. Never bought any SATA drives for anything I assembled.
I didn't know about Micron/Crucial exiting the RAM business. I remember thinking that they were some of the best priced in 2017 when there seemed to be a severe RAM price increase. GPUs were also very expensive at that time. I don't know when that 2017 crisis ended. I can only recall something about South Korean factories. Don't even know if it was RAM or GPUs that were coming out of those factories. I haven't been paying any real attention to computer hardware (or video games) since then: my memories are vague.
Back then, you had a few trends like Intel Optane. They were something like a cache between RAM and hard drives that sped up hard drives at times. That was a total flop. But people into custom PC building were going on about it at the time.
They were SSDs that plugged into graphics card slots.
M.2 is the form factor
PCIe is the hardware interface
NVMe is the protocol, requires PCIe
Every single M.2 NVMe is a PCIe card. All those "NVMe PCIe adapters" are purely electrical. Maybe some noise suppression or something but there no active conversion going on.
If you're thinking of SSD cards like the Optane ones, those were designed for enterprise. They weren't even NAND. It was a different architecture to fill the gap between NAND and RAM. it only really mattered for datacenters because low-latency and mediocre sequential speed wasn't impressive for consumer usage. Also, Intel did their typical retard thing and locked it to specific chipsets. Great for databases though.
Wouldn't people just be moving away from SATA SSDs because those M.2 NVMe SSDs or whatever they're called, the ones shaped like a rectangular wafer, seem superior in practically every way? Aren't there are also PCIe SSDs, at the very least, from Intel? (Edit: After a quick search, they appear to have been yet another long gone trend, another Intel thing that failed. The Intel 750 series were SSDs that plugged into graphics card slots.)
I don't like SATA at all. Never bought any SATA drives for anything I assembled.
I didn't know about Micron/Crucial exiting the RAM business. I remember thinking that they were some of the best priced in 2017 when there seemed to be a severe RAM price increase. GPUs were also very expensive at that time. I don't know when that 2017 crisis ended. I can only recall something about South Korean factories. Don't even know if it was RAM or GPUs that were coming out of those factories. I haven't been paying any real attention to computer hardware (or video games) since then: my memories are vague.
Back then, you had a few trends like Intel Optane. They were something like a cache between RAM and hard drives that sped up hard drives at times. That was a total flop. But people into custom PC building were going on about it at the time.
M.2 is the form factor
PCIe is the hardware interface
NVMe is the protocol, requires PCIe
Every single M.2 NVMe is a PCIe card. All those "NVMe PCIe adapters" are purely electrical. Maybe some noise suppression or something but there no active conversion going on.
If you're thinking of SSD cards like the Optane ones, those were designed for enterprise. They weren't even NAND. It was a different architecture to fill the gap between NAND and RAM. it only really mattered for datacenters because low-latency and mediocre sequential speed wasn't impressive for consumer usage. Also, Intel did their typical retard thing and locked it to specific chipsets. Great for databases though.