Why are you acting as if Walsh's comments here are a step back?
I'm not. I'm pointing out that its a waste of time from a talking head trying to score clickbait points on meaningless controversy. Its using technicalities to argue something that nobody will change their mind over on technicalities. People know what the Injuns are, and calling them something else won't change the emotional manipulation they are capable of and the history people were taught about them.
You aren't moving in the right direction to fix the problem anymore than they fixed the problem on their end by making people call them Native Americans in the first place.
You are giving him the most charitable interpretation of this action possible, bordering on utopian, while I'm pointing out that its such a worthless little action that the time spent on doing it is more wasted than its possible gain compared to actively saying the things you have said here.
I'm not. I'm pointing out that its a waste of time from a talking head trying to score clickbait points on meaningless controversy. Its using technicalities to argue something that nobody will change their mind over on technicalities. People know what the Injuns are, and calling them something else won't change the emotional manipulation they are capable of and the history people were taught about them.
You aren't moving in the right direction to fix the problem anymore than they fixed the problem on their end by making people call them Native Americans in the first place.
You are giving him the most charitable interpretation of this action possible, bordering on utopian, while I'm pointing out that its such a worthless little action that the time spent on doing it is more wasted than its possible gain compared to actively saying the things you have said here.