he seemingly can't get along with anyone for more than 2 minutes because he always goes scorched earth over nothing.
This is a major problem with the "new" or "alt" right in general, whatever you want to call it.
Everything is a purity spiral, where you must be the angriest about the issue at hand, and are compelled to virtue signal about it or else you are complicit in the alternative extreme. You cannot have any half measures, and any nuance or trepidation is a sign of being secretly X trying to subvert.
So instead of anyone coming together to fight the greater foes, even with a difference of opinion, you must instead bicker and fight each other over the finer points of "I'm 110% right and if you don't suck my cock for it you are a Jew" over and over.
What if being a shit stirrer is the op? Fuentes did team up with Anglin to do the "Optics War" back around 2019 or so. And let me tell you, if there is anyone with good optics, it's definitely Anglin and Fuentes!
Disagreements are fine, but people need to make sense. "Anti-Semites for ZOG Wars" doesn't. It's Azov-tier nonsense.
ETA: I don't think disagreeing over whether Israel killed Kirk is an issue, though.
At the top its always an op, for what purpose is usually the question. No talking head is forthcoming with their angle, and if you find yourself agreeing with them its a sign they are succeeding at that manipulation rather than them being some truth speaker.
For us at the commoner level, where there is literally nothing on the line other than the sweet, sweet updoots? Its complete nonsense, seeking validation as the supreme noticer instead of trying to make sense.
It's difficult to tell if that's what goes on here. I know the .win site is absolutely infested with nefarious accounts. It's way more obvious if you use the T_D.
I can think of quite a few that are highly suspicious on here alone, but its not like they aren't in good company with how many have let themselves become ideologically captured over Jews, Trump, and Woke anyway so its pretty meaningless a distinction.
This is a major problem with the "new" or "alt" right in general, whatever you want to call it.
Everything is a purity spiral, where you must be the angriest about the issue at hand, and are compelled to virtue signal about it or else you are complicit in the alternative extreme. You cannot have any half measures, and any nuance or trepidation is a sign of being secretly X trying to subvert.
So instead of anyone coming together to fight the greater foes, even with a difference of opinion, you must instead bicker and fight each other over the finer points of "I'm 110% right and if you don't suck my cock for it you are a Jew" over and over.
What if being a shit stirrer is the op? Fuentes did team up with Anglin to do the "Optics War" back around 2019 or so. And let me tell you, if there is anyone with good optics, it's definitely Anglin and Fuentes!
Disagreements are fine, but people need to make sense. "Anti-Semites for ZOG Wars" doesn't. It's Azov-tier nonsense.
ETA: I don't think disagreeing over whether Israel killed Kirk is an issue, though.
At the top its always an op, for what purpose is usually the question. No talking head is forthcoming with their angle, and if you find yourself agreeing with them its a sign they are succeeding at that manipulation rather than them being some truth speaker.
For us at the commoner level, where there is literally nothing on the line other than the sweet, sweet updoots? Its complete nonsense, seeking validation as the supreme noticer instead of trying to make sense.
It's difficult to tell if that's what goes on here. I know the .win site is absolutely infested with nefarious accounts. It's way more obvious if you use the T_D.
I can think of quite a few that are highly suspicious on here alone, but its not like they aren't in good company with how many have let themselves become ideologically captured over Jews, Trump, and Woke anyway so its pretty meaningless a distinction.
Funny enough it seems to come and go by days.