I remember having to read "The Pilgrim's Path" in school where the moral is comfort and convenience are tools of the devil. I'm starting to realize the author's intent was literal.
Not really. Antifa in the fentanyl floyd era posited themselves as an invincible occupational force, invulnerable and inevitable. Then some kid managed to make the bolshevik bastards bleed.
All of a sudden, antifa wasn't so invincible anymore. The same is true of the british state.
Sorry, I forgot about that time a kid shot some guys and that sparked a national movement of similar shootings and Antifa fizzled out into nothing. How could I forget such an important event that changed the world? Or the time an Italian guy shot a health insurance CEO and lots of other high profile CEOs were shot in the following weeks?
Maybe because they never happened that way and what actually happened was the kid got arrested and smeared by the media, causing everyone else to be afraid of defending themselves, and also no other CEOs died even though a lot of people supported the shooting?
When was a nation A ever motivated to go to war against another nation B because some guys from A started attacking B? Pretty much never. How many nations have been motivated to go to war by false flags? Plenty. So obviously you don't start a revolution by being violent. A revolution starts when you are under attack.
That must be why our military walked right through those inbred goat herders in Afghanistan and had zero problems whatsoever taking it over. And living among the people they are fighting against would surely make it even easier than that, with the "rebels" knowing where they and their family lives and all.
There is no military on the planet that can take on the US citizenry, ours included. And that's even before taking into account the massive percentage of them that would be fighting for the people from the inside of the machine.
Anyone pushing the message that gun ownership is futile is a poison spewing traitor waging psychological warfare on behalf of the establishment.
Oh yeah, those goat herders who were all armed to the teeth with guns, right? No, they weren't hindered because of guns but because the people were uniformly opposed to them being there. Guns can help, but what you really need is a huge number of people working together. "Me and my guns" isn't going to do that.
I remember having to read "The Pilgrim's Path" in school where the moral is comfort and convenience are tools of the devil. I'm starting to realize the author's intent was literal.
Do you mean The Pilgrim's Progress?
That's the one. And I think I might even be confusing it with the Celestial Railroad. I need to fix my sleep schedule.
"Let"?
Ha, they really are subjects pleading for mercy from their rulers.
Moral of the story: Never give up your guns.
It's the same in every country. Having guns against the state is like bringing a feather to a knife fight.
Not really. Antifa in the fentanyl floyd era posited themselves as an invincible occupational force, invulnerable and inevitable. Then some kid managed to make the bolshevik bastards bleed.
All of a sudden, antifa wasn't so invincible anymore. The same is true of the british state.
Sorry, I forgot about that time a kid shot some guys and that sparked a national movement of similar shootings and Antifa fizzled out into nothing. How could I forget such an important event that changed the world? Or the time an Italian guy shot a health insurance CEO and lots of other high profile CEOs were shot in the following weeks?
Maybe because they never happened that way and what actually happened was the kid got arrested and smeared by the media, causing everyone else to be afraid of defending themselves, and also no other CEOs died even though a lot of people supported the shooting?
When was a nation A ever motivated to go to war against another nation B because some guys from A started attacking B? Pretty much never. How many nations have been motivated to go to war by false flags? Plenty. So obviously you don't start a revolution by being violent. A revolution starts when you are under attack.
Welcome to earth lol
That must be why our military walked right through those inbred goat herders in Afghanistan and had zero problems whatsoever taking it over. And living among the people they are fighting against would surely make it even easier than that, with the "rebels" knowing where they and their family lives and all.
There is no military on the planet that can take on the US citizenry, ours included. And that's even before taking into account the massive percentage of them that would be fighting for the people from the inside of the machine.
Anyone pushing the message that gun ownership is futile is a poison spewing traitor waging psychological warfare on behalf of the establishment.
The Japanon 1st Amendment Pasta is a sure-fire cure for such nonsense.
Oh yeah, those goat herders who were all armed to the teeth with guns, right? No, they weren't hindered because of guns but because the people were uniformly opposed to them being there. Guns can help, but what you really need is a huge number of people working together. "Me and my guns" isn't going to do that.
Today your Magna Carta rights of Trial by Jury signed in 1215 AD were crushed by a second generation Guyanese.
https://x.com/notodigitalid/status/1993840356870508720
was digital id in their election manifesto?
removing jury trials is 1000x more scary than digital id