You ever notice that, whenever someone can't actually refute the majority of your points, they fixate on a single thing they can nitpick, and make that the basis of their reply?
Well, I imagine you do, since that's exactly what you've chosen to do.
Like I said, I never start the religion conversation. Your ilk always does. You can pretend "satan" and "evil" are synonymous, but they aren't. One describes a concept, and another describes an antagonistic from a fictional story. You'll know which is which, I'm sure, by the fact that one can quite easily discuss evil as an idea, as a concept, and as a personalization without ever mentioning satan (or any other magic demon from any other bit of fiction).
So, kindly, fuck right the hell off with trying to flip this to me. I have every right to get annoyed when you folks walk up to the table, unzip, and whip your god dick out, and all the infantile name calling and ad hominems won't change the fact. You lot should be perfectly able to observe evil people doing evil things without soyfacing, pointing, and going "see, see, it's just like in my favorite bible stories!"
I'm certainly capable, and I'm just some dude on the internet. Are you so below me that you cannot?
Also, top fucking kek with trying to say my oldfagging is somehow inferior to your oldfagging because you spent more time on the donald before the rest of the .win and later scored ecosystem slowly sprouted from the ground, and you demanding respect as some sort of chief greybeard. Notice we aren't on the fucking donald, nor are we talking about it. That place does its own thing, and I don't bother them doing it. This board drew a different crowd for a different reason, and came up later.
Well, I imagine you do, since that's exactly what you've chosen to do.
Well why would I attack the rest, as I agree with them in concept? There is nothing disagreeable in what you were trying to say, only in the retarded method you went about saying it.
One describes a concept, and another describes an antagonistic from a fictional story
So why was Peter called Satan by Jesus? Hm, almost like it was a concept in that story too because the word had a literal meaning before 2000 years blurred it.
I'm certainly capable
Doubt, considering how pissy you've been about seeing a word you don't like.
you demanding respect as some sort of chief greybeard
There is no respect to be taken. You brought up your oldfaggotry originally to try and act like it gave you credit to dismiss people, and I simply keep bringing up my own to say your assertions are wrong and these people have always been here.
Notice we aren't on the fucking donald
T_D founded the .win website. Everything that existed here came downstream from people they approved letting in, and it was much later that it became more open to the greater internet. You'd know that if you were around as far back as you keep trying to pretend.
You ever notice that, whenever someone can't actually refute the majority of your points, they fixate on a single thing they can nitpick, and make that the basis of their reply?
Well, I imagine you do, since that's exactly what you've chosen to do.
Like I said, I never start the religion conversation. Your ilk always does. You can pretend "satan" and "evil" are synonymous, but they aren't. One describes a concept, and another describes an antagonistic from a fictional story. You'll know which is which, I'm sure, by the fact that one can quite easily discuss evil as an idea, as a concept, and as a personalization without ever mentioning satan (or any other magic demon from any other bit of fiction).
So, kindly, fuck right the hell off with trying to flip this to me. I have every right to get annoyed when you folks walk up to the table, unzip, and whip your god dick out, and all the infantile name calling and ad hominems won't change the fact. You lot should be perfectly able to observe evil people doing evil things without soyfacing, pointing, and going "see, see, it's just like in my favorite bible stories!"
I'm certainly capable, and I'm just some dude on the internet. Are you so below me that you cannot?
Also, top fucking kek with trying to say my oldfagging is somehow inferior to your oldfagging because you spent more time on the donald before the rest of the .win and later scored ecosystem slowly sprouted from the ground, and you demanding respect as some sort of chief greybeard. Notice we aren't on the fucking donald, nor are we talking about it. That place does its own thing, and I don't bother them doing it. This board drew a different crowd for a different reason, and came up later.
Well why would I attack the rest, as I agree with them in concept? There is nothing disagreeable in what you were trying to say, only in the retarded method you went about saying it.
So why was Peter called Satan by Jesus? Hm, almost like it was a concept in that story too because the word had a literal meaning before 2000 years blurred it.
Doubt, considering how pissy you've been about seeing a word you don't like.
There is no respect to be taken. You brought up your oldfaggotry originally to try and act like it gave you credit to dismiss people, and I simply keep bringing up my own to say your assertions are wrong and these people have always been here.
T_D founded the .win website. Everything that existed here came downstream from people they approved letting in, and it was much later that it became more open to the greater internet. You'd know that if you were around as far back as you keep trying to pretend.