Ah I see we are at the point of pretending to not understand second order effects and general reputation just to argue the point. Let's go with the more recent one of her calling out AIPAC, and grandstanding on being one of the only politicians not taking Israeli money. Which is a great thing, but it doesn't absolve you of everything else you are either.
Surely you can see how certain people would rush to her side to scream "based" because if you say anything anti-Jewish you become their champion, and vice versa for the other side. And literally anything else about you ceases to exist because now you are the "antisemite" person, as either a great or terrible thing.
Ah I see we are at the point of pretending to not understand second order effects and general reputation just to argue the point. Let's go with the more recent one of her calling out AIPAC, and grandstanding on being one of the only politicians not taking Israeli money. Which is a great thing, but it doesn't absolve you of everything else you are either.
Why is the only pol not taking AIPAC money criticized for alleged sins that in reality are universal?
Surely you can see how certain people would rush to her side to scream "based" because if you say anything anti-Jewish you become their champion,
So how did she become their champion without doing that?
And literally anything else about you ceases to exist because now you are the "antisemite" person, as either a great or terrible thing.
Why does she get a pass on sinning just because she has one less manner in which she does so?
Her net worth increased to the multimillions during her time in Congress, and she tried to derail deportation efforts to protect her own construction business. Clearly she found ways to make shady money regardless, so there is no "principle" at play beyond "Jew Bad."
Why does she get a pass on sinning just because she has one less manner in which she does so?
It's weird to fixate and name-call someone who sins less, simply because a useless carnival barker is attacking her.
Her net worth increased to the multimillions during her time in Congress
Wait till you hear who has been making multibillions with crypto scams. Hint: it's a guy you aren't calling a traitor.
so there is no "principle" at play beyond "Jew Bad."
Yet you have not shown a single way in which she said 'Jew bad'. I don't believe you would actually claim that criticziing the Rothschilds is "Jew bad", nor do you believe that I hate Jews, since you have complained about critic sof Stormfags to me many times.
It's weird to fixate and name-call someone who sins less
Her name comes up, I respond to it. Once again, she and others draw attention to her so the criticisms follow. If you'd like to make a show of breaking down Dan Crenshaw's failings, then make a conversation about him.
Is it "fixating and name-calling" when we have a big hoot tearing down Ted Cruz for being retarded? Or is that fine because you don't like him.
Wait till you hear who has been making multibillions with crypto scams
A business guy who forewent his presidential salary the first time (haven't heard about this time, wouldn't surprise me) around because he was making his own money and never made a show, that I can recall, about who was funding him?
Shocking, its almost like its not "I made money" that's a problem, but the grandstand about "I am so principled I didn't take this money, I just made it in a different uncouth manner instead!" But again, when he does it its because he is awful but she gets special "yeah but I mean, not exactly" concessions.
I don't believe you would actually claim that criticziing the Rothschilds is "Jew bad"
I don't need to, because that's literally how our current culture war works. She said something that could vaguely be anti-Jew, so now she is the anti-Jew person. Both for people to run in to tear apart and prop up.
Again, you are purposefully being obtuse about something easy to understand, that you'd criticize any other day.
Ah I see we are at the point of pretending to not understand second order effects and general reputation just to argue the point. Let's go with the more recent one of her calling out AIPAC, and grandstanding on being one of the only politicians not taking Israeli money. Which is a great thing, but it doesn't absolve you of everything else you are either.
Surely you can see how certain people would rush to her side to scream "based" because if you say anything anti-Jewish you become their champion, and vice versa for the other side. And literally anything else about you ceases to exist because now you are the "antisemite" person, as either a great or terrible thing.
Why is the only pol not taking AIPAC money criticized for alleged sins that in reality are universal?
So how did she become their champion without doing that?
True.
Why does she get a pass on sinning just because she has one less manner in which she does so?
Her net worth increased to the multimillions during her time in Congress, and she tried to derail deportation efforts to protect her own construction business. Clearly she found ways to make shady money regardless, so there is no "principle" at play beyond "Jew Bad."
It's weird to fixate and name-call someone who sins less, simply because a useless carnival barker is attacking her.
Wait till you hear who has been making multibillions with crypto scams. Hint: it's a guy you aren't calling a traitor.
Yet you have not shown a single way in which she said 'Jew bad'. I don't believe you would actually claim that criticziing the Rothschilds is "Jew bad", nor do you believe that I hate Jews, since you have complained about critic sof Stormfags to me many times.
Her name comes up, I respond to it. Once again, she and others draw attention to her so the criticisms follow. If you'd like to make a show of breaking down Dan Crenshaw's failings, then make a conversation about him.
Is it "fixating and name-calling" when we have a big hoot tearing down Ted Cruz for being retarded? Or is that fine because you don't like him.
A business guy who forewent his presidential salary the first time (haven't heard about this time, wouldn't surprise me) around because he was making his own money and never made a show, that I can recall, about who was funding him?
Shocking, its almost like its not "I made money" that's a problem, but the grandstand about "I am so principled I didn't take this money, I just made it in a different uncouth manner instead!" But again, when he does it its because he is awful but she gets special "yeah but I mean, not exactly" concessions.
I don't need to, because that's literally how our current culture war works. She said something that could vaguely be anti-Jew, so now she is the anti-Jew person. Both for people to run in to tear apart and prop up.
Again, you are purposefully being obtuse about something easy to understand, that you'd criticize any other day.