I notice that the description of the bill doesn’t seem to include any protections for the professional regulatory bodies dictating treatment protocols or punishing doctors from administering treatment that has become politically politcized like Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine.
A lot of the prominent Canuck COVID docs that were sanctioned & run out of the profession came as the result of overzealous regulatory bodies overstepping their scope and starting to dictate medical treatment protocols.
Some of the bodies started limiting the scope that docs could write jab exemptions to a ridiculous degree (decreeing there could only be two official reasons for exemptions written - 1) anaphylaxis & 2) jab-induced myocarditis diagnosed by a cardiologist, preventing docs from prescribing Ivermectin, punishing docs for social media posts providing inconvenient heterodox COVID data, sanctioning any doc not jabbing everything in sight, etc).
Interesting.
I notice that the description of the bill doesn’t seem to include any protections for the professional regulatory bodies dictating treatment protocols or punishing doctors from administering treatment that has become politically politcized like Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine.
A lot of the prominent Canuck COVID docs that were sanctioned & run out of the profession came as the result of overzealous regulatory bodies overstepping their scope and starting to dictate medical treatment protocols.
Some of the bodies started limiting the scope that docs could write jab exemptions to a ridiculous degree (decreeing there could only be two official reasons for exemptions written - 1) anaphylaxis & 2) jab-induced myocarditis diagnosed by a cardiologist, preventing docs from prescribing Ivermectin, punishing docs for social media posts providing inconvenient heterodox COVID data, sanctioning any doc not jabbing everything in sight, etc).
Common denominator subverted