My issues with Walsh are more societal than cultural.
He doesn't have a hard enough stance against gay marriage, and really fumbled the ball talking to Jillian Michaels about it, failing to correct her about the change in definition in recent years, and failing to fall back on the hard stats about the negative impact they bring to society when it comes to mental health, physical health, longevity, and rearing a family.
He also really did a poor job of bringing back the topic about the Christian ethics and how and why the classification was given to a man and a woman, and how it works as an infrastructural backbone for building and maintaining a civilisation.
My other issue with Walsh is his kowtowing to the crypto-feminnist policies that continue to work as the harbinger of ill intent for a healthy relationship. He continues to overlook the zeitgeist and its effects on how it impacts women and families; he still hasn't crossed the "repeal the 19th" bridge, and still hasn't acknowledged the social contagion the majority of women have fallen under due to liberal progressive ideologies. He talks around the topic but has yet to address the elephant in the room about the unearned rights that have given women an egotistical view about their worth.
Andrew Wilson more eloquently and factually addresses these points to his audience, and until Walsh can bring himself around to these viewpoints, he's still treading on the tradcon waters that prevent his audience from arriving at the right conclusions for the current problems.
My other issue with Walsh is his kowtowing to the crypto-feminnist policies that continue to work as the harbinger of ill intent for a healthy relationship.
There I do agree. He is clouded by his own experience and does not get how modern relationships are. He puts almost the entire burden on men.
My issues with Walsh are more societal than cultural.
He doesn't have a hard enough stance against gay marriage, and really fumbled the ball talking to Jillian Michaels about it, failing to correct her about the change in definition in recent years, and failing to fall back on the hard stats about the negative impact they bring to society when it comes to mental health, physical health, longevity, and rearing a family.
He also really did a poor job of bringing back the topic about the Christian ethics and how and why the classification was given to a man and a woman, and how it works as an infrastructural backbone for building and maintaining a civilisation.
My other issue with Walsh is his kowtowing to the crypto-feminnist policies that continue to work as the harbinger of ill intent for a healthy relationship. He continues to overlook the zeitgeist and its effects on how it impacts women and families; he still hasn't crossed the "repeal the 19th" bridge, and still hasn't acknowledged the social contagion the majority of women have fallen under due to liberal progressive ideologies. He talks around the topic but has yet to address the elephant in the room about the unearned rights that have given women an egotistical view about their worth.
Andrew Wilson more eloquently and factually addresses these points to his audience, and until Walsh can bring himself around to these viewpoints, he's still treading on the tradcon waters that prevent his audience from arriving at the right conclusions for the current problems.
There I do agree. He is clouded by his own experience and does not get how modern relationships are. He puts almost the entire burden on men.