There's a subtle but important sleight of hand here. "Enabling insider trading" is a meaningfully different accusation than what you initially said. Let's look at your initial comment:
For fucks sake I already stated openly that I do believe he is doing it intentionally.
Let me quote it for you:
Yeah, I think he'll be more than willing to negotiate publicly when he doesn't have to just to manipulate the market so the very friends he's already bending over backwards for can profit from it.
But even if he isn't he's still enabling insider trading and not shutting that shit down. That is corruption. Whether you like it or not and giving him a pass for it is cuck behavior.
Of course I don't have hard evidence for my accusation just as I don't have hard evidence for Trump being a paid, bribed or blackmailed pawn of Israel.
So please stop psychoanalyzing me like a retard. I'm neither moving the goalpost nor trying to pull a fast one on you.
Sometimes I like to talk to try to get to the bottom of something, but I'm hearing you loud and clear: if it sounds like baseless reddit-tier retardation on the surface, it probably is. No sense wasting both of our time.
I don't even necessarily require hard proof to believe something, I just would here because the circumstantial evidence is so weak and the competing explanations are much more reasonable. I could much more easily believe him to be blackmailed by Israel without hard proof because the surrounding evidence is so much stronger. In this case, it just looks like mental gymnastics to look at orange man's normal way of doing things and put a negative spin on it.
For fucks sake I already stated openly that I do believe he is doing it intentionally.
Let me quote it for you:
Of course I don't have hard evidence for my accusation just as I don't have hard evidence for Trump being a paid, bribed or blackmailed pawn of Israel.
So please stop psychoanalyzing me like a retard. I'm neither moving the goalpost nor trying to pull a fast one on you.
Sometimes I like to talk to try to get to the bottom of something, but I'm hearing you loud and clear: if it sounds like baseless reddit-tier retardation on the surface, it probably is. No sense wasting both of our time.
I don't even necessarily require hard proof to believe something, I just would here because the circumstantial evidence is so weak and the competing explanations are much more reasonable. I could much more easily believe him to be blackmailed by Israel without hard proof because the surrounding evidence is so much stronger. In this case, it just looks like mental gymnastics to look at orange man's normal way of doing things and put a negative spin on it.
Yeah. Perhaps all of it is exactly that. He didn't become a billionaire by doing nothing after all.