There’s a reason Americans used to lynch people throughout most of American history even though they had a court system and the Bill of Rights. When a crime was as serious as murdering an innocent child and there were several credible witnesses, or they had definitive evidence that proved who the culprit was, the people didn’t bother wasting their time and money going through a court case, let alone waste their money housing an evil person for years to come. Technicalities have led to very bad people getting away with murder in the past, but that sort of thing was far less likely to happen when people would just mob up and take matters into their own hands after a miscarriage of justice.
There’s a reason Americans used to lynch people throughout most of American history even though they had a court system and the Bill of Rights. When a crime was as serious as murdering an innocent child and there were several credible witnesses, or they had definitive evidence that proved who the culprit was, the people didn’t bother wasting their time and money going through a court case, let alone waste their money housing an evil person for years to come. Technicalities have led to very bad people getting away with murder in the past, but that sort of thing was far less likely to happen when people would just mob up and take matters into their own hands after a miscarriage of justice.
I totally understand the moral arguments of not allowing a lynching of someone who stands accused of heinous crimes but there's only 1 witness/victim.
But you're right, things like that nigger who stabbed the girl on the bus should be hung from the nearest tree.
If the regime fails to uphold justice, people will make their own.