Unless you actually thought she would ostracize Israel and cut relations with them, this picture means nothing. Wait and see what she actually does. Not gonna hold my breath that she will be great for Japan or anything, but we'll see.
Takaichi married a fellow member of the House of Representatives, Taku Yamamoto, in 2004.[108] They have no children together, but Takaichi adopted Yamamoto's three children from a previous marriage. They divorced in July 2017, with Takaichi citing differing political views and aspirations as the reason.[109][110] They remarried in December 2021. She has four grandchildren through her stepchildren.[111][112]
During her first marriage, she assumed her husband's family name legally, but continued to use her maiden name in public life. Upon remarriage, Taku Yamamoto took the name Takaichi instead, fulfilling the legal requirement that married couples have the same family name.
(per Wikipedia, all emphasis mine)
So, career political woman with no biological children (huge red flag given Japan's birth crisis), married a simp, divorced and then remarried for clearly political and economic reasons. You make a prediction based on this and tell me.
For men, you could make the exception that he's sacrificing his future to do the work for the future of his nation. For women, it simply means she doesn't care about anyone but herself, since women do not sacrifice anything for anyone but themselves.
For all the people wrongly claiming to give the "first female Japanese Prime Minister" a chance, they will eat crow when she eventually betrays the nation for her own benefit. It happens EVERY single time, and the fact people have not recognised this pattern for female career politicians makes any hope of course-correction bleak, since the people here are supposed to be "based" and "red-pilled", yet still fall for all the red flags of Simponomics 101.
Unfortunately for every man actually like that, there's god only knows how many (hundreds? thousands?) who don't impregnate women because they aren't attracted to them.
What does any of that have to do with the picture you posted? If you want, you could've just made this comment as a post and it would have been better than this one.
Obviously those are all bad things, but they don't justify this retarded post which is just a picture of a meeting.
Unless you actually thought she would ostracize Israel and cut relations with them, this picture means nothing. Wait and see what she actually does. Not gonna hold my breath that she will be great for Japan or anything, but we'll see.
(per Wikipedia, all emphasis mine)
So, career political woman with no biological children (huge red flag given Japan's birth crisis), married a simp, divorced and then remarried for clearly political and economic reasons. You make a prediction based on this and tell me.
Childless is one of the biggest red flags in a politician.
For men, you could make the exception that he's sacrificing his future to do the work for the future of his nation. For women, it simply means she doesn't care about anyone but herself, since women do not sacrifice anything for anyone but themselves.
For all the people wrongly claiming to give the "first female Japanese Prime Minister" a chance, they will eat crow when she eventually betrays the nation for her own benefit. It happens EVERY single time, and the fact people have not recognised this pattern for female career politicians makes any hope of course-correction bleak, since the people here are supposed to be "based" and "red-pilled", yet still fall for all the red flags of Simponomics 101.
Unfortunately for every man actually like that, there's god only knows how many (hundreds? thousands?) who don't impregnate women because they aren't attracted to them.
Is it just me or is there a bit of resemblance to Ghislaine?
Thats very disappointing. I wanted the nips to do well.
We all did
What does any of that have to do with the picture you posted? If you want, you could've just made this comment as a post and it would have been better than this one.
Obviously those are all bad things, but they don't justify this retarded post which is just a picture of a meeting.
You don't see the obvious problem with the supposedly "based and trad" first female PM of Japan not marrying until 40 and never having kids?
Who wants to tell him
Reading is hard, I know.