My dude, I'm not saying you've gotta stuff her box or anything, I just don't like when people outright lie about stuff. I'd think someone in any KiA channel would be interested in the truth, and you get called out for some serious CDS and lies every time she comes up as a topic.
Is being honest that hard for you or is this some sort of cultural thing?
This still shows literally no evidence of Israeli involvement in Charlie Kirk's assassination
That's great, but before you moved your goalposts your complaint was that the texts from Kirk were fake, not that Israel had killed Kirk.
"Screenshots of texts are so trivially easy to fake a 10yo could do it."
I just don't like when people outright lie about stuff.
Where's the lie? Cite it.
My opinion of Candice is that I do not trust her and I won't.
but before you moved your goalposts your complaint was that the texts from Kirk were fake, not that Israel had killed Kirk
Both of those things are not true.
I never moved my goalposts, and I never said that the texts were fake. I had no information to judge whether they were fake or not, which is why I never said they were fake. You're assigning a position to me that I never held.
"Screenshots of texts are so trivially easy to fake a 10yo could do it."
Take it up with "MuslimsWorshipSatan", not me. I never said that that's what happened, just that I don't trust Candice.
I also had no evidence that Israel had killed Kirk, and still don't. Yet I'm involved in 3 different conversations currently claiming that these texts are indefatigable proof that Israel killed Krik. And considering Candice is using this to push her argument that Israel killed Charlie Kirk, these two positions are linked, even though the texts show literally no connection.
My dude, I'm not saying you've gotta stuff her box or anything, I just don't like when people outright lie about stuff. I'd think someone in any KiA channel would be interested in the truth, and you get called out for some serious CDS and lies every time she comes up as a topic.
Is being honest that hard for you or is this some sort of cultural thing?
That's great, but before you moved your goalposts your complaint was that the texts from Kirk were fake, not that Israel had killed Kirk.
"Screenshots of texts are so trivially easy to fake a 10yo could do it."
Where's the lie? Cite it.
My opinion of Candice is that I do not trust her and I won't.
Both of those things are not true.
I never moved my goalposts, and I never said that the texts were fake. I had no information to judge whether they were fake or not, which is why I never said they were fake. You're assigning a position to me that I never held.
Take it up with "MuslimsWorshipSatan", not me. I never said that that's what happened, just that I don't trust Candice.
I also had no evidence that Israel had killed Kirk, and still don't. Yet I'm involved in 3 different conversations currently claiming that these texts are indefatigable proof that Israel killed Krik. And considering Candice is using this to push her argument that Israel killed Charlie Kirk, these two positions are linked, even though the texts show literally no connection.