Well now, where have I heard THIS stupid argument before? Ah, from that greek-wannabe dipshit who coddles niggers and doesn't like it when his fellow durkadurka scumfuck cultists are discussed.
White Flight was rarely from violent dispossession. For the most part it was economic need and a sense of unfamiliarity. Whites who fled from violent crime were some of the last people to leave. The first groups of people were people who noticed that their property values had stagnated or hadn't improved. Typically this would be the result of Leftist economic policies that they had already supported, while also different policies supported bringing in large black populations that would vote Democrat in political blocks. The second wave of white flight came from people who had now realized that they lived in a completely demographically changed area already. They were older, their friends had gone (or died), their kids didn't live in the town they grew up in, and most of the businesses and street life had changed. So, realizing that they needed to sell their house to live off the profits for retirement anyway, they did so. Only the last group of whites, who would have lived long enough in the town for them to already have been considered in the extremely small minority, would they have moved for the crime. The increase in crime rates came much later, not initially, and not even during the middle of the demographic change.
Nah it was violence. Detroit riots led to people fleeing. Same thing is now happening in NY and California thanks to legal crime.
In fact, there used to be a video of Baltimore a few years back that was in black and white and filmed in the late 50's or early 60's. Wish I had it but it was censored. A bunch of whites were yelling niggers not welcome here, stating that they'll bring crime and violence. Looks like they were right.
No it isn't, and every bit of data shows it, including the personal experiences. Most whites left prior to spikes in crimes. And many black neighborhoods weren't criminal until they started adopting left-wing policies and values.
Define 'violent dispossession.' Because what your are saying completely whitewashes the experiences of my friends and family in the medium sized city I grew up in. You could literally plot on a map neighborhoods going to hell from north to south as blacks and hispanics moved south and whites tried to stay one step ahead of them. Almost everyone I know was caught in this pattern at some point. What came first, the stagnating property values or criminals? Whatever you believe, everyone knew those things go together because you could see how the next neighborhood over is doing. You don't wait until you or your neighbor's house is burgled. You would sell and get the hell out of there before it was too late.
Violent Disposession typically means literally forced out of your home at gun point by armed men, which doesn't even happen now with most squatters, which is why we have to broaden the concept to "the crime rate is bad and I don't want to live here anymore". I'm willing to entertain that rhetoric to allow people to recognize demographic displacement, but it is a bit hyperbolic.
What came first, the stagnating property values or criminals?
The property values. This is literally what Broken Windows Policing seeks to prevent. Aesthetics can actually cause crime. It's the same reason why Civil Engineers don't build walkways that are tunnels, they create transitional spaces for crime with no escape routes for victims, and no outside visibility, which basically attracts criminals to an area. After "Pioneer" black arrived fully integrated normally, what would happen is that you would get a wave of non-Pioneers who would want to live in a black minority community in a white town, then get a third wave of blacks who wanted to live in a black community. That is typically when the crime would actually increase.
Boy, I wonder where the surname Yablon comes from...
Oy vey
https://xcancel.com/AlexYablon/status/1973190729636978812#m
Well now, where have I heard THIS stupid argument before? Ah, from that greek-wannabe dipshit who coddles niggers and doesn't like it when his fellow durkadurka scumfuck cultists are discussed.
White Flight was rarely from violent dispossession. For the most part it was economic need and a sense of unfamiliarity. Whites who fled from violent crime were some of the last people to leave. The first groups of people were people who noticed that their property values had stagnated or hadn't improved. Typically this would be the result of Leftist economic policies that they had already supported, while also different policies supported bringing in large black populations that would vote Democrat in political blocks. The second wave of white flight came from people who had now realized that they lived in a completely demographically changed area already. They were older, their friends had gone (or died), their kids didn't live in the town they grew up in, and most of the businesses and street life had changed. So, realizing that they needed to sell their house to live off the profits for retirement anyway, they did so. Only the last group of whites, who would have lived long enough in the town for them to already have been considered in the extremely small minority, would they have moved for the crime. The increase in crime rates came much later, not initially, and not even during the middle of the demographic change.
Nah it was violence. Detroit riots led to people fleeing. Same thing is now happening in NY and California thanks to legal crime.
In fact, there used to be a video of Baltimore a few years back that was in black and white and filmed in the late 50's or early 60's. Wish I had it but it was censored. A bunch of whites were yelling niggers not welcome here, stating that they'll bring crime and violence. Looks like they were right.
No it isn't, and every bit of data shows it, including the personal experiences. Most whites left prior to spikes in crimes. And many black neighborhoods weren't criminal until they started adopting left-wing policies and values.
Define 'violent dispossession.' Because what your are saying completely whitewashes the experiences of my friends and family in the medium sized city I grew up in. You could literally plot on a map neighborhoods going to hell from north to south as blacks and hispanics moved south and whites tried to stay one step ahead of them. Almost everyone I know was caught in this pattern at some point. What came first, the stagnating property values or criminals? Whatever you believe, everyone knew those things go together because you could see how the next neighborhood over is doing. You don't wait until you or your neighbor's house is burgled. You would sell and get the hell out of there before it was too late.
Violent Disposession typically means literally forced out of your home at gun point by armed men, which doesn't even happen now with most squatters, which is why we have to broaden the concept to "the crime rate is bad and I don't want to live here anymore". I'm willing to entertain that rhetoric to allow people to recognize demographic displacement, but it is a bit hyperbolic.
The property values. This is literally what Broken Windows Policing seeks to prevent. Aesthetics can actually cause crime. It's the same reason why Civil Engineers don't build walkways that are tunnels, they create transitional spaces for crime with no escape routes for victims, and no outside visibility, which basically attracts criminals to an area. After "Pioneer" black arrived fully integrated normally, what would happen is that you would get a wave of non-Pioneers who would want to live in a black minority community in a white town, then get a third wave of blacks who wanted to live in a black community. That is typically when the crime would actually increase.