I think the risk of danger is massively overstated honestly. Kirk was genuinely shocking to hear was shot because I'd probably rate him as among the lowest value political assassination targets in existence because his entire schtick was just spewing the most mainstream positions you could think of that could still be considered right by even current year standards. He was utterly interchangeable with dozens of already known figures and could be replaced by anyone else willing to continually move along with the overton window and remain in the center.
The only people who really stand to benefit especially from the deaths of these centrist cuck types are the far right, but only in the context of the ostensibly killer being part of a group we oppose Which is why so much has been done by the controlled op "right" to control the narrative and reinforce the position, otherwise more would be radicalized to our views. You'd have to be genuinely retarded to shoot any of these faggots because it would be counter productive to the goal of the shooter.
It's their moderate positions that make me hate them, they exist to prevent a truly radical right from arising and serve as a road block.
What a triumph for cooler heads prevailing, onto the next enemy territory!"
"Cooler heads" need to be severed, a victory for "cooler heads" is a loss for our collective survival.
The only people who really stand to benefit especially from the deaths of these centrist cuck types are the far right, but only in the context of the ostensibly killer being part of a group we oppose Which is why so much has been done by the controlled op "right" to control the narrative and reinforce the position, otherwise more would be radicalized to our views.
This is exactly what I suspect is happening, but even allowing for the possibility that there were other forces involved in Kirk's shooting, the aftermath involved massive swathes of the American left revealing themselves to be pretty cool with it happening. Obviously the overwhelming amount of them are reddit slacktivists who won't do shit, except to children, but I believe they serve as a culturing medium for a tiny but scalable core of crazies/trannies who will do shit, even to people as middle-of-the-road as Charlie Kirk was. Those crazies now know they have a team of cheerleaders millions strong. However unlikely it was for someone like Kirk to be targeted, as a phenomenon it is slightly more likely now than it should have seemed to anyone before September 10.
So I think this movement that urges the continuation of the Kirk campus chats is either a bunch of chickenhearted soft men living in denial of the political landscape or else, in the case that Robinson is a patsy, an orchestration of forces trying to soothe their angry golem. And I speculate that without knowing if they consider their golem to be the right, the left or the US itself in general.
the aftermath involved massive swathes of the American left revealing themselves to be pretty cool with it happening
And how does that matter? Supporting a killing is pretty worthless and inoffensive, I want them actively out and participating in the killing themselves. I don't want anyone to be safe, it seems like the only time the so called "right" is even willing to humor the idea of fighting back is when they personally are being killed.
However unlikely it was for someone like Kirk to be targeted, as a phenomenon it is slightly more likely now than it should have seemed to anyone before September 10.
And? Good, who gives a shit. Did anyone think people actually cared about talking heads who don't spout their views?
So I think this movement that urges the continuation of the Kirk campus chats is either a bunch of chickenhearted soft men living in denial of the political landscape or else,
The political landscape is massively misunderstood and there isn't even a real "left" at this point as it's effectively just a coalition of nonwhites, faggots, jews, and women, and treating it as a unified force with actual positions is fucking retarded. Being white, being against jews, and discussing age of consent, and being against female autonomy are all things far more likely to lead to someone killing you then sitting on a collage campus and saying "I'm fine with white genocide as long as it happens legally" or "I support sexual promiscuity, premarital sex, sodomy, and crossdressing, but you should have to wait until you're 18 before being mutilated by life ruining drugs"
I think the risk of danger is massively overstated honestly. Kirk was genuinely shocking to hear was shot because I'd probably rate him as among the lowest value political assassination targets in existence because his entire schtick was just spewing the most mainstream positions you could think of that could still be considered right by even current year standards. He was utterly interchangeable with dozens of already known figures and could be replaced by anyone else willing to continually move along with the overton window and remain in the center.
The only people who really stand to benefit especially from the deaths of these centrist cuck types are the far right, but only in the context of the ostensibly killer being part of a group we oppose Which is why so much has been done by the controlled op "right" to control the narrative and reinforce the position, otherwise more would be radicalized to our views. You'd have to be genuinely retarded to shoot any of these faggots because it would be counter productive to the goal of the shooter.
It's their moderate positions that make me hate them, they exist to prevent a truly radical right from arising and serve as a road block.
"Cooler heads" need to be severed, a victory for "cooler heads" is a loss for our collective survival.
This is exactly what I suspect is happening, but even allowing for the possibility that there were other forces involved in Kirk's shooting, the aftermath involved massive swathes of the American left revealing themselves to be pretty cool with it happening. Obviously the overwhelming amount of them are reddit slacktivists who won't do shit, except to children, but I believe they serve as a culturing medium for a tiny but scalable core of crazies/trannies who will do shit, even to people as middle-of-the-road as Charlie Kirk was. Those crazies now know they have a team of cheerleaders millions strong. However unlikely it was for someone like Kirk to be targeted, as a phenomenon it is slightly more likely now than it should have seemed to anyone before September 10.
So I think this movement that urges the continuation of the Kirk campus chats is either a bunch of chickenhearted soft men living in denial of the political landscape or else, in the case that Robinson is a patsy, an orchestration of forces trying to soothe their angry golem. And I speculate that without knowing if they consider their golem to be the right, the left or the US itself in general.
And how does that matter? Supporting a killing is pretty worthless and inoffensive, I want them actively out and participating in the killing themselves. I don't want anyone to be safe, it seems like the only time the so called "right" is even willing to humor the idea of fighting back is when they personally are being killed.
And? Good, who gives a shit. Did anyone think people actually cared about talking heads who don't spout their views?
The political landscape is massively misunderstood and there isn't even a real "left" at this point as it's effectively just a coalition of nonwhites, faggots, jews, and women, and treating it as a unified force with actual positions is fucking retarded. Being white, being against jews, and discussing age of consent, and being against female autonomy are all things far more likely to lead to someone killing you then sitting on a collage campus and saying "I'm fine with white genocide as long as it happens legally" or "I support sexual promiscuity, premarital sex, sodomy, and crossdressing, but you should have to wait until you're 18 before being mutilated by life ruining drugs"