It is a policy effect, women in submission had fathers who were in charge of giving them away for most of history. They were the deciders in who their daughters ended up with ultimately.
And based on just what you write on this forum in the short time you've been here, no father worth his salt would leave his daughter in your hands unless you arrived with enough money to raise a village. You are a whiny, edgy faggot who cannot even escape under the thumb of a family who hates you that hooked you on drugs to keep you compliant. What part of that is a man?
No, I'm speaking directly to you and speaking of the effects the policy you are pushing will have on you.
This is a forum with persistent names, if you want to have anon conversations where no one can ever remember the bullshit you said yesterday go to a chan board.
I only ended up in this position due to the state of society, none of what you said is an argument against my policy though, only personal attacks related to my policy.
So nothing is ever your fault, you have no agency, and you can't resist the evils if they come calling at your door.
Again, what part of that is a man? Why would anyone trust someone like that to protect their daughter?
I have no particular beef with the policy myself, I'm confident I'd succeed in either environment and it would be an improvement over the current, only that the losers who use it thinking it'll finally get them a boyfriend-free gf is hilarious.
It is a policy effect, women in submission had fathers who were in charge of giving them away for most of history. They were the deciders in who their daughters ended up with ultimately.
And based on just what you write on this forum in the short time you've been here, no father worth his salt would leave his daughter in your hands unless you arrived with enough money to raise a village. You are a whiny, edgy faggot who cannot even escape under the thumb of a family who hates you that hooked you on drugs to keep you compliant. What part of that is a man?
All you're doing is referencing outside circumstances.
No, I'm speaking directly to you and speaking of the effects the policy you are pushing will have on you.
This is a forum with persistent names, if you want to have anon conversations where no one can ever remember the bullshit you said yesterday go to a chan board.
I only ended up in this position due to the state of society, none of what you said is an argument against my policy though, only personal attacks related to my policy.
So nothing is ever your fault, you have no agency, and you can't resist the evils if they come calling at your door.
Again, what part of that is a man? Why would anyone trust someone like that to protect their daughter?
I have no particular beef with the policy myself, I'm confident I'd succeed in either environment and it would be an improvement over the current, only that the losers who use it thinking it'll finally get them a boyfriend-free gf is hilarious.