The Charlie Kirk Assassination is Now Officially A Coverup
(www.banned.video)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
You honestly believe that they needed the COVID hoax, which only had just begun during the election, to drive truckloads of ballots to the voting stations?
Do you realize just how much money the pharmaceutical companies made during COVID? How many authoritarian measures were made acceptable? How many people were injured and killed through the vaccinations? And you think they did that to prevent Ziondon from getting elected? You've got to be kidding me.
It was a trial run for the digital ID bullshit the UK is getting now amongst other things. To make this sort of shit acceptable. To terrify the people into turning of their brains and simply following orders no matter how idiotic they might be.
But to get back to your original question. They did it because they had to scramble for a cover story. If you have to whip up something quick you will make serious mistakes. Just like it happened with the Vegas shooting. It's that fucking simple.
Sure, those reasons are also part of covid - win-win for them. Point that you agree with is they were telling lies to accomplish their goal.
But here you think that goal was just to cover up a really incompetent mistake. So now we know a lot more about this conspiracy. They're super advance in planning and execution, made a really key mistake, didn't abort, then used their assets to plant a fake bullet, but were unable to plant a gun even though since the patsy didn't actually shoot and didn't have the gun with him they could put his DNA on any gun they wanted.
Simple!
The ones who do the killing aren't necessarily the ones who do the coverup.
The ones who tried to sink the USS Liberty weren't the ones who covered it up.
And btw changing your story midway through instead of just sticking with will only ensure that people think you're lying.
That's why we say "they", could be one group or several acting together.
The point is somebody had the ability to plant evidence, but only exactly enough to make an impossible to believe story. Or they purposely made an impossible to believe story so you know they were forced to cover it up.
Just asking the question makes an already unlikely conspiracy theory even more unlikely. Why only exactly as much cover-up as to make an impossible to believe story?
If it was Israel it was simply another one their 'we're gonna do shit and let you clean up the mess because we own you' shenanigans. Just as Bibi has been doing to Trump since the beginning of his second term. Bibi knows he can do whatever the fuck he wants and Trump will clean up the mess. The only limit is what Trump can't possibly clean up.
There is no need to plant evidence because there will never be an independent investigation. The FBI is probably more corrupt than the government itself. Nothing will come of it. Just as nothing came of the Vegas shooting bullshit story.
Because a proper coverup needs preparation. It's pretty much impossible to do it properly without any preparation. Not in a public scenario like this.