I don't know how I feel about the mic argument, but undeniably, someone in the front row grabs something off Kirk or the ground near his body and runs off.
Almost all these theories rely on the old trick of "if you can't prove this 1% thing that looks off, then the other 99% are now invalid forever."
Its literally the CSI effect on real life, where the 'thing' is solved by finding an exact series of events and details that happened to the T and it wraps itself up nice in a coherent box that fits their personal biases and theories only totally coincidentally.
I don't know how I feel about the mic argument, but undeniably, someone in the front row grabs something off Kirk or the ground near his body and runs off.
A gay communist shot him with a stolen hunting rifle. Fixating and obsessing over some meaningless detail is a complete waste of time .
Almost all these theories rely on the old trick of "if you can't prove this 1% thing that looks off, then the other 99% are now invalid forever."
Its literally the CSI effect on real life, where the 'thing' is solved by finding an exact series of events and details that happened to the T and it wraps itself up nice in a coherent box that fits their personal biases and theories only totally coincidentally.
It's because they have a jew fetish and want to distract from the actual problems of leftist terrorism (and especially trannies).
They're simply not smart people and finding out about Jews oneshots them.