Patsy theory
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
I actually doubt it because of the target.
For how influential he is, Charlie Kirk wasn't a JFK so they wouldn't need that level of subterfuge to do this. This sounds more like cope froma side that doesn't want to admit the groomed trans so much, kids hang around the quiet kids for safety!
Not cope, more like an attempt to explain evidence that doesn't make sense. There is no way a gun was down that kid's pants in any of the stairwell shots. It's possible he thought his role was a spotter, but then they put the shooting on him.
Also, the AIPAC mega-donor crowd was very unhappy with Charlie, and he was reportedly in fear of his life.
It was clearly pre-planned, seemingly by multiple people. He may or may not have been involved. Him not having the gun on him proves neither his guilt nor his innocence; the gun could have already been up on the roof.
I haven't looked super closely, come to think of it, but those pics were him climbing the stairs, right? So before the shooting. So there's no claim he should have had the gun on him at the time.
The stairwell photos are indeed before the shooting, but the FBI alleges they are photos of him carrying the rifle up to the roof concealed in his pants. That is in fact the claim and it is as patently absurd as the sloped roof excuse at Butler.
I fucking hate the FBI.
The people at the top are lying traitors, and a big chunk of the rest are leftist subversives too.
FBI needs to be completely dismantled, and then possibly reconstituted, with all new people.
I do think it is possible that multiple people are involved and now he is not cooperating because he is defending the others.
However the others can just be other leftiests that have radicalized him over the last few years.
Considering multiple people seemingly knew something was going down, and various law enforcement agencies are saying they're looking into conspiracy connections and Discord (et al.) logs, when they usually are very definitive on the "lone wolf" claim, makes me think there's a lot more going on here.
There was either foreign or domestic federal interference, or a genuine network of leftist terrorists, is my guess at this time. Or, of course, both, since the feds love to let these things happen. I'm thinking very high chance of some level of leftist network. Multiple people online and at the school knew this was happening. Again, my guess, at least.
Charlie Kirk was a huge zionist who went around and galvanized zoomer conservatives, but recently Kirk started openly criticizing israel and jews in some regards. He said israel probably allowed Oct7 to happen so they'd have an excuse to invade Gaza, as it makes no sense why a country with as militarized a border and robust intelligence apparatus would have dropped the ball as badly as they did. And he said secular jews are the dominant funder of progressive activism. The conspiracy theory is there were fears Kirk would start turning young conservatives against israel en masse, which would be a huge problem as when boomers die out support for israel will drop significantly. So Kirk was taken out, and would you look at that, Ben Shapiro is taking over his college debate tour.