I don't think the left realizes what they've done by endorsing murder. America is about to enter a period that's going to make The Troubles look like an episode of Teletubbies.
I'm so, so fucking glad I don't live anywhere near a city right now.
I don't think the left realizes what they've done by endorsing murder.
They've done nothing but endorse murder for all of human history. This is just a big, high profile one. But, yeah, it's truly mask-off, and making a bunch more people wake up to the nature of the leftist creature.
As people have been saying, it would have been hard for them to find a worse target. They already tried with Trump, anyway, and that's about the only one that comes to mind that would have caused a worse stir.
Charlie Kirk was a moderate and compassionate guy, who the left called a Nazi, and most of the people more rightwing than your average normie right-winger called milquetoast. His biggest crime was talking to people.
It's not like they killed (and to be very clear, that wouldn't be right either, of course) Tate, or Fuentes, or Alex Jones, or something, or even the people who have that same reputation, like Candace Owens. No...they went and murdered Charlie Kirk.
America is about to enter a period that's going to make The Troubles look like an episode of Teletubbies.
I'm not so sure. Although the right is pissed, their nature hasn't changed. I think it will eventually boil over, as it always does, if we continue along this path, but I'm not sure we're there yet.
I'm so, so fucking glad I don't live anywhere near a city right now.
Can you expand on that? What is it you think will or might happen in the cities? Because leftists own the cities, if anything, we'll see more left-on-right violence, like we always do. At least that's what I'd theorize.
They already tried with Trump, anyway, and that's about the only one that comes to mind that would have caused a worse stir.
Honestly, I think Kirk is actually a worst pick for them then Trump. Even on the right Trump's own attitude can come off as divisive and boorish, it's one of the things that drive a lot of people to him but it's also one of the things that drives people away, I can't tell you how many people I know personally that say "I like a lot of what Trump's doing but I wish he'd just shut up". Kirk was a genuinely nice guy where the only negative things people can say about him are lies, they can disagree with him, sure (hell, I disagreed with him a lot), but he was patient and respectful even when crowds of people were shouting right at him, he gave an open mic to whoever wanted to say something, he constantly told his own side to be quite and let the other side speak, he never advocated violence or hate, even if you think some of the things he said were wrong you couldn't deny that they came from a place of compassion (for example he didn't oppose trans ideology out of hate for trans people but because he wanted them to live better quality lives and believed that the trans lifestyle was hurting them), he was basically the political version of Mr. Rogers. Also take into account that most Trump supporters are probably Kirk supporters as well but that's not going to be true the other way around.
Even on the right Trump's own attitude can come off as divisive and boorish
Maybe, but he's also a symbol, and his supporters are more "radical" than Kirk's.
It's not about who is a better or less controversial person. It's about the reactions it stirs up. Although it seems Nothing Ever Happens, if they actually managed to take out Trump, there's a chance something might, in fact, happen.
It's not a value judgement about Trump or Kirk. It's saying that, if some leftist actually murdered the President, some serious fucking shit would go down.
If we enter an era of unchecked tranny violence, as it appears we've already done, 99% of it is going to take place in the cities, just like BLM did. They're all bugs and the idea of leaving their concrete hives terrifies them. If you're more than 15 minutes away from any given downtown area you're probably going to be fine no matter what happens.
I don't think the left realizes what they've done by endorsing murder. America is about to enter a period that's going to make The Troubles look like an episode of Teletubbies.
I'm so, so fucking glad I don't live anywhere near a city right now.
They've done nothing but endorse murder for all of human history. This is just a big, high profile one. But, yeah, it's truly mask-off, and making a bunch more people wake up to the nature of the leftist creature.
As people have been saying, it would have been hard for them to find a worse target. They already tried with Trump, anyway, and that's about the only one that comes to mind that would have caused a worse stir.
Charlie Kirk was a moderate and compassionate guy, who the left called a Nazi, and most of the people more rightwing than your average normie right-winger called milquetoast. His biggest crime was talking to people.
It's not like they killed (and to be very clear, that wouldn't be right either, of course) Tate, or Fuentes, or Alex Jones, or something, or even the people who have that same reputation, like Candace Owens. No...they went and murdered Charlie Kirk.
I'm not so sure. Although the right is pissed, their nature hasn't changed. I think it will eventually boil over, as it always does, if we continue along this path, but I'm not sure we're there yet.
Can you expand on that? What is it you think will or might happen in the cities? Because leftists own the cities, if anything, we'll see more left-on-right violence, like we always do. At least that's what I'd theorize.
Honestly, I think Kirk is actually a worst pick for them then Trump. Even on the right Trump's own attitude can come off as divisive and boorish, it's one of the things that drive a lot of people to him but it's also one of the things that drives people away, I can't tell you how many people I know personally that say "I like a lot of what Trump's doing but I wish he'd just shut up". Kirk was a genuinely nice guy where the only negative things people can say about him are lies, they can disagree with him, sure (hell, I disagreed with him a lot), but he was patient and respectful even when crowds of people were shouting right at him, he gave an open mic to whoever wanted to say something, he constantly told his own side to be quite and let the other side speak, he never advocated violence or hate, even if you think some of the things he said were wrong you couldn't deny that they came from a place of compassion (for example he didn't oppose trans ideology out of hate for trans people but because he wanted them to live better quality lives and believed that the trans lifestyle was hurting them), he was basically the political version of Mr. Rogers. Also take into account that most Trump supporters are probably Kirk supporters as well but that's not going to be true the other way around.
Maybe, but he's also a symbol, and his supporters are more "radical" than Kirk's.
It's not about who is a better or less controversial person. It's about the reactions it stirs up. Although it seems Nothing Ever Happens, if they actually managed to take out Trump, there's a chance something might, in fact, happen.
It's not a value judgement about Trump or Kirk. It's saying that, if some leftist actually murdered the President, some serious fucking shit would go down.
If we enter an era of unchecked tranny violence, as it appears we've already done, 99% of it is going to take place in the cities, just like BLM did. They're all bugs and the idea of leaving their concrete hives terrifies them. If you're more than 15 minutes away from any given downtown area you're probably going to be fine no matter what happens.