At this point, my patience, which I have extended for far too long as it is, is at an end. It's quite obvious to see we're going to continue taking past one another, as you remain steadfastly determined to find evidence for your chosen conclusion instead of taking in what evidence there is and arriving at a conclusion from there, and it should be obvious to you that you aren't going to convince me of the validity of the anthropic universe hypothesis.
Are these properties consistent enough to be observed?
What keeps the matter from being noticeable on a macrocosmic level or from dematerialising on a macrocosmic level?
Women can give birth to tree trunks or raccoons or electronics?
Evolution has no organisation?
So you admit there is uniformity?
So you're saying that there is no entropic patterns that can be observed at all over any period of time in any organism?
An emergent function of what?
If there are no rules and no intended goals, what is the function?
At this point, my patience, which I have extended for far too long as it is, is at an end. It's quite obvious to see we're going to continue taking past one another, as you remain steadfastly determined to find evidence for your chosen conclusion instead of taking in what evidence there is and arriving at a conclusion from there, and it should be obvious to you that you aren't going to convince me of the validity of the anthropic universe hypothesis.
Have a nice day.