Dont let your kids go to college
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (79)
sorted by:
You really need to re-read the original texts. God didn't create the universe or Earth for man, he gave man dominion over the Earth. The Bible also directly states that the Earth is just one realm, and there are many well beyond the comprehension of man. The Book of Enoch even goes over the multi-versal spectrum of dimensions well beyond our own.
An oxymoron. You said reality doesn't have rules and then described a RULE that dictates the flow of energy.
Which is, again, a hierarchical interweaving of complex systems sculpted within the rules of our physical reality.
This goes back to my point about solipsism and the lack of introspection from atheist.
I'll be the first to explain this to you because in your atheist communities they will never go over this (and I'm not doing this to be antagonistic, but to get you to see beyond the veil you've been draped behind).
Reality has rules because otherwise we would have the Uncertainty Principle operating marcocosmically -- we would see quantum field theory apply to ALL matters of energy and matter. Things would appear or disappear, materialise, or immaterialise, or dematerialise without consideration or adherence to systemic negentropy; all things would be encapsulated within entropy, indefinitely.
But obviously the process of life follows rules, the process of energy follows rules, and concepts like gravity also follow rules, strictly enough that -- as you pointed out -- we are able to ostensibly observe them with our senses, empirically observe them with tools, and systematically catalogue them with developed and rote scientific principles.
If reality didn't have rules, you wouldn't be able to observe patterns.
Sir, you will retract that absolute gang rape of quantum theory, or I shall see you on the dueling field in the morning. This level of misunderstanding is so complete as to become intentional and malicious lie.
There are no "rules" to reality, I will restate, only field interactions. And we do see quantum effects macroscopically; they are the underpinnings of reality. That you think that there is some intentional restriction keeping this organized, and that you fail to understand that the uncertainty observation refers to an inability to humans to measure quantum scale interactions past a certain level of precision, and rather imply that there is inherently some level where reality stops working, are all evidence of a deep and permeating confusion on the matter that you attempt to pass off as fact. Just because we are limited, at the quantum level, to attempting to guage the true nature of cats by throwing other cats at them at speed and seeing what happens, does not mean information theory suddenly stops applying, that just because we cannot tell electrons apart doesn't mean their spacetime coordinates are not wholly unique.
Retract your nonsense, and return once you have understood the difference between a rule and a tendency.
Interactions that are limited in their functions; ergo, rules.
Feel free to describe how limitations aren't rules.
Simple. Field interactions are the patterns that emerge when energetic waveforms with certain frequencies intersect. These are not rules nor limitations; there is nothing intentionslly keeping these things acting the way they do, merely the probabilistic outcome of countless numbers of waves intersecting.
Thats the key difference. You desperately need there to be intentional element to reality; some will or force keeping things either apart or together on purpose, and you call the interactions you see the "rules" of reality, like the "rules" of the road or a criminal code. But there isn't any intentional force or effect. Its just plain, boring, inpersonal energy interactions, and the things we call "laws" are simply the patterns to interactions that we've observed so commonly and prevailingly that we have declared that this is how they almost always, 99.99...9% of the time, interact.
What maintains the patterns?
Which goes back to what I said before -- Quantum Field Theory should then apply to all forms of matter and energy macrocosmically.
On a subatomic level, observed energy may change in ways that is discordant when changing the properties of observation, but on a macrocosmic scale they do not do that.
A cat does not become two cats when put into a box; a cat does not radically materially change the composition of its fur when put next to a dog; a cat does not dematerialise if it catches a rat.
What keeps energy from dematerialising randomly, rematerialising anywhere, or immaterialising through entropy without cause?
Begging the question... again.
What you've just described is a rule -- any observable pattern is a combination of elements that repeat within a defined set of actions. Anything that repeats is following a rule of systemic repetition -- otherwise, it would not repeat if it were not a rule.
And since you don't seem to understand what the definition of a rule is, here it is: one of a set of explicit or understood regulations or principles governing conduct within a particular activity or sphere.
Energy interactions as a set of defined patterns is a rule of scientific law.
A good example of this is gravity -- our planets follow orbital rules, without them, the planets would drift apart. Our known universe follows the observed patterns and rules of relativity, without it, everything would fall apart. What keeps the rules of gravity in place? What prevents the orbits from changing? What determines how gravity maintains consistency?
You also keep forgetting to address the point that negantropy prevents everything from operating under the constant rule of entropy.