Trump urges non-violence in response to Kirk Assassination
(www.foxnews.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
I mean, he's the president. He can't say anything but that.
Charlie Kirk was brutally and senselessly murdered. Trump has been pretty good at calling this out.
Unless you think we should jump straight to "Murder them all, I'm President Donald J. Trump, and I approve this message," he's been pretty good on this. He's praised and celebrated Charlie, and drawn attention to his murder. I've had my disagreements with Trump, but he's done well here, as far as I can tell.
He was never going to do that, and that's the point I've been making about the civil war talk. It seems like it's dying out now anyway though.
It was never going to lead to civil war. The right as a whole is still too obsessed with turning the other cheek. What it will lead to is a bunch of lone wolves out for vengeance. We haven't met the next McVeigh yet, but we will soon.
And we're going to have to for there to be any hope of the left dialing shit back for real instead of just for show. They never ever see the downside of anything they do until it bites their side in the ass be it gerrymandering, abolishing the filibuster, or political violence. Remember their "no bad tactics, only bad targets" motto? This shit isn't gonna end until some bad targets get hit.