Yeah, so instead they just publicly threaten to accuse extremely powerful people, who raped children and are blackmailed by even more powerful intelligence agencies, without having any actual evidence. What could possibly go wrong?
Nothing. They can't get sued by anyone for defamation and they won't get killed by anyone because it would just put this entire situation into the spotlight once again which the perpetrators would rather avoid.
What perpetrators? Who would rather avoid, what are their names?
So what are you saying? Epstein was just some innocent guy and nothing happened on his island? Us not knowing who he was providing his sex trafficking services to is precisely the issue.
nobody knows who to suspect
The government knows. Because it's them. And they're trying to bury the matter.
We know that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor to Epsteins island. What happened? Nothing. We know that Prince Andrew was a client of Epsteins. What happened? Pretty much nothing.
So don't act like you would grab your gun and go after Epsteins clients based on a mere accusation without any corroborating evidence.
Read up on the Dutroux case of the 90s in Belgium. Witnesses came forward. Investigators actually tried to solve the case. What followed were two dozen 'suicides' and 'accidents'. And Dutroux who supposedly never supplied anyone any kids, just like Epstein, got out of prison in 2019.
So what are you saying? Epstein was just some innocent guy
Yes, that's clearly exactly what I was saying. Are you a fucking liar or fucking retarded?
I'm not going to bother wasting my time responding to liars or retards. My previous point stands- they're at greater risk making vague threats about releasing names as opposed to actually just naming names because if they publicly said the names the accused would be implicated in their deaths. Nothing you've said contradicts that.
Yeah, so instead they just publicly threaten to accuse extremely powerful people, who raped children and are blackmailed by even more powerful intelligence agencies, without having any actual evidence. What could possibly go wrong?
Nothing. They can't get sued by anyone for defamation and they won't get killed by anyone because it would just put this entire situation into the spotlight once again which the perpetrators would rather avoid.
What perpetrators? Who would rather avoid, what are their names?
These bitches didn't say so they can be killed at will because nobody knows who to suspect had them killed SINCE THEY DIDN'T SAY SHIT.
So what are you saying? Epstein was just some innocent guy and nothing happened on his island? Us not knowing who he was providing his sex trafficking services to is precisely the issue.
The government knows. Because it's them. And they're trying to bury the matter.
We know that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor to Epsteins island. What happened? Nothing. We know that Prince Andrew was a client of Epsteins. What happened? Pretty much nothing.
So don't act like you would grab your gun and go after Epsteins clients based on a mere accusation without any corroborating evidence.
Read up on the Dutroux case of the 90s in Belgium. Witnesses came forward. Investigators actually tried to solve the case. What followed were two dozen 'suicides' and 'accidents'. And Dutroux who supposedly never supplied anyone any kids, just like Epstein, got out of prison in 2019.
Yes, that's clearly exactly what I was saying. Are you a fucking liar or fucking retarded?
I'm not going to bother wasting my time responding to liars or retards. My previous point stands- they're at greater risk making vague threats about releasing names as opposed to actually just naming names because if they publicly said the names the accused would be implicated in their deaths. Nothing you've said contradicts that.