After some 20 people were killed in an Israeli strike on a hospital in Gaza Monday, media zeroed in on their new favourite narrative, implying that because journalists were among the dead, they were targeted. Indeed, the headline carried by the Globe and Mail above a Reuters wire story read as if killing journalists was the point of the strike: “Multiple journalists killed by Israeli strikes on Gaza’s Nasser Hospital.” It wasn’t until several paragraphs into the story that it was reported that “Israeli troops fired two artillery shells at the hospital, targeting what they suspected was a Hamas surveillance camera on the roof.”
Only in their own minds does "we fired a shell at a hospital because we were targeting a camera, and killed 20 people" make them sound better.
It's like the previous argument of "we didn't starve that kid, one of our shells blew off part of his skull off 4 months ago. Checkmate atheists!"
Only in their own minds does "we fired a shell at a hospital because we were targeting a camera, and killed 20 people" make them sound better.
It's like the previous argument of "we didn't starve that kid, one of our shells blew off part of his skull off 4 months ago. Checkmate atheists!"
why do they need artillery to hit a camera? can't they get the ghost of ukraine to snipe it for them?