Also, are you really saying it's NOT weird to delete the fucking moon landing footage? Cause that's kind of wild. "If you don't keep everything..." We're talking about one of the most historic moments in all of mankind, here.
I'm sorry to have to contradict you, but you did in fact say it.
You think the Apollo landings were fake. But wait, there are records of the landings. There are, for example, photographs. You obviously think these records are fake.
...but also, your point in this thread is, "they didn't keep certain records! That proves it's fake!" Therefore, you think not having records proves it's fake.
So yes, my characterization of your position is accurate. Your position is self-contradictory. You think that records are fake, and at the same time, you think that not having records is evidence that it's fake.
are you really saying it's NOT weird
"weird" is zoomer girl talk. Please say something more meaningful. What exactly do you think was destroyed? Please don't link me to a news story (spoiler: I'm already well aware of it). I want you to say in your own words what you think happened.
What specifically do you think was the value of the records that were destroyed?
Don't say "lolol it's weird! Its so weird and creepy lolol!!"
Say something like, "the following records were destroyed: _______. As a result, we cannot know _______ (some fact about the missions)"
This rigor that I'm demanding of you is the difference between a fly-by-night idiot who looks at something with no depth of understanding and declares, "that's weird" and someone with the intelligence and determination to actually get to the truth. Which one are you?
I don't believe I said that?
Also, are you really saying it's NOT weird to delete the fucking moon landing footage? Cause that's kind of wild. "If you don't keep everything..." We're talking about one of the most historic moments in all of mankind, here.
Never claimed that.
I'm sorry to have to contradict you, but you did in fact say it.
You think the Apollo landings were fake. But wait, there are records of the landings. There are, for example, photographs. You obviously think these records are fake.
...but also, your point in this thread is, "they didn't keep certain records! That proves it's fake!" Therefore, you think not having records proves it's fake.
So yes, my characterization of your position is accurate. Your position is self-contradictory. You think that records are fake, and at the same time, you think that not having records is evidence that it's fake.
"weird" is zoomer girl talk. Please say something more meaningful. What exactly do you think was destroyed? Please don't link me to a news story (spoiler: I'm already well aware of it). I want you to say in your own words what you think happened.
What specifically do you think was the value of the records that were destroyed?
Don't say "lolol it's weird! Its so weird and creepy lolol!!"
Say something like, "the following records were destroyed: _______. As a result, we cannot know _______ (some fact about the missions)"
This rigor that I'm demanding of you is the difference between a fly-by-night idiot who looks at something with no depth of understanding and declares, "that's weird" and someone with the intelligence and determination to actually get to the truth. Which one are you?