Is something the American public broadly does not care about.
They already have influence and money.
I think the key takeaway of the last five years has been that no, they don't, and that's why the loyalty of media and experts can be rented so cheaply. They preach progressivism because they are Winstons.
Why bring children into it
The purpose of a thing is what it does. Why? Because man is running old wetware that wants to climb into a wooden horse, slit a thousand Trojan throats, burn their temples and fuck their daughters. All of the enlightenment, all of Locke and Hobbes and Mill, all of that was just a blink of an eye so far as human nature and DNA are concerned. And that is why Hobbes was right.
Reputation and audience respectively. Both of which are dwindling as science commands less respect and media commands less attention, both because they have squandered those things supporting the causes they have been rented to support. Yet even faced with the demise of their institutions they continue to do so.
Why?
Because you're mistaken about them having money and influence. They have neither. They are Winstons. They have a TASTE of money and influence, but only just the taste of it, enough to get them hooked on the supply. But they do not possess it. And that is why they can be controlled.
Is something the American public broadly does not care about.
I think the key takeaway of the last five years has been that no, they don't, and that's why the loyalty of media and experts can be rented so cheaply. They preach progressivism because they are Winstons.
The purpose of a thing is what it does. Why? Because man is running old wetware that wants to climb into a wooden horse, slit a thousand Trojan throats, burn their temples and fuck their daughters. All of the enlightenment, all of Locke and Hobbes and Mill, all of that was just a blink of an eye so far as human nature and DNA are concerned. And that is why Hobbes was right.
Who told you that?
What is being rented? Because that's the thing they already have. Epstein died 6 years ago. You need to adjust your framing.
A person is not a "thing."
Yet we also build Cathedrals and Cities.
Is this some kind of backwards pedophile apology or some shit? People find this behavior repugnant. That does also seem to be genetic.
Maybe there are two species of people. Maybe you never know which one you're actually talking to out here.
Reputation and audience respectively. Both of which are dwindling as science commands less respect and media commands less attention, both because they have squandered those things supporting the causes they have been rented to support. Yet even faced with the demise of their institutions they continue to do so.
Why?
Because you're mistaken about them having money and influence. They have neither. They are Winstons. They have a TASTE of money and influence, but only just the taste of it, enough to get them hooked on the supply. But they do not possess it. And that is why they can be controlled.
Why are you applying logic of today to a system that existed two decades ago?
How long was Epstein operating? How long ago did he die?
Do you have a grip on these two facts?
Why are you thinking that the desire to fuck young women is new?
He was a procurer. Rome had those.