Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

89
Grok's analysis of tweets tagging @TeamYouTube confirms that YouTube's AI suddenly started mass terminate channels with no strikes or warnings early this month for generic explanations like "spam, deceptive practices or harassment" (media.scored.co)
posted 294 days ago by FarOutThere 294 days ago by FarOutThere +89 / -0
32 comments share
32 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
▲ 10 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 10 points 294 days ago +10 / -0

I have banned lots of people and I have been banned from many things, so I can see both sides of this issue. People absolutely get banned unfairly both from AI and from human moderators. Because AI has false positives or is configured aggressively and human moderators go crazy regularly.

But also, people who get banned for good reason never admit to wrong doing - because there's no reason to. They're already banned, so they might as well say they did "nothing", and maybe some other moderator will believe them and unban them, or maybe a mob will get riled up and that's a type of revenge they can have. Or maybe a human moderator will see their bogus complaint, dig up their horrendous behavior and post it publicly and justify the ban. If that happens, well, they lost nothing because they're still banned. Plus they forced a moderator to waste more time and that's a type of revenge. This is what most GDPR requests are about too, they get to say "do this!" and the other guy has to, lets them regain some tiny amount of power. You can see this when people get arrested on body cam videos, "loosen my cuffs!", "read me my rights!", "pick up my shoe!", "call my mom!", "bring me to jail!!" - they want to give an order and have it followed to sooth their wounded ego.

People will post loli, they'll post cropped CP, or they'll behave in such away that if you know you know, and they'll do that around kids. Then you ban them and they'll try to pretend it was just a cartoon, or just a girl in a swimsuit, or they were just being friendly, or actually talking about cheese pizza, or whatever. They'll come back with a vpn or tor or on their phone, they'll recruit little buddies to help them, they'll hack into other people's accounts. You really have no idea of the depths of humanity until you're on the other end of moderation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– WEFFaggotsMustDie 6 points 294 days ago +6 / -0

Pah.

One virtuous moderator does not erase the fact that every single one of us here today are here because ourselves and the communities we were a part of got banned by some censorious cunt of a mod. How the fuck we came out of the days of Usenet and thought self-appointed retards with digital guns were better than a self-policing democracy built over time I don't know.

On behalf of everyone here, you're a faggot. Perhaps not you personally, but the caste you represent.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 2 points 294 days ago +2 / -0

>self-appointed retards

>self-policing democracy

Are these not the same thing?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 2 points 294 days ago +2 / -0

How the fuck we came out of the days of Usenet and thought self-appointed retards with digital guns were better than a self-policing democracy built over time I don't know.

People probably just figured a self policing democracy couldn't survive eternal summer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 294 days ago +2 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– Xachariah 6 points 294 days ago +6 / -0

Yeah, it's hard to trust the banned.

Youtube is getting flooded with low tier AI spam and deceptive stolen slop from other people's content, so they really aught to be banning more.

And none of the people banned will admit it publicly when they're calling on youtube to reverse the policy.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy