AGI is here. Feel the future of GPT5
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
I reached my conclusion by going to the website and using the product myself. It's free. It clearly understands things and can produce useful results.
Your conclusion is objectively false, no matter what your feelings say. An LLM is a word frequency prediction calculator. That’s all. It doesn’t “understand” anything.
What is your criteria for true "understanding"?
Not hallucinating things that take five seconds for a human to prove.
So when it doesn't hallucinate, is that good enough to say that sometimes it understands and sometimes it doesn't? Or do you need there to be no possibility of it ever being wrong?