So 242 is "international law" now? Thus need not even be mentioned at all? Just assumed? Fuck no.

Yeah, Security Council resolutions are binding. You don't even know that? How marvelous.

What happened in it's waters and airspace was entirely up to them

As true as your claim that there are WMDs in Iraq. Why are you even talking about this, when you don't know the first thing about it? Here's what the ICJ (and you probably don't even know what that is) had to say about it:

In its Wall Advisory Opinion, the Court did not express a view as to the legal status of the Gaza Strip, as the construction of the wall did not affect the Gaza Strip. The Gaza Strip is an integral part of the territory that was occupied by Israel in 1967. Following the 1967 armed conflict, Israel, as the occupying Power, placed the Gaza Strip under its effective control. However, in 2004, Israel announced a “Disengagement Plan”. According to that plan, Israel was to withdraw its military presence from the Gaza Strip and from several areas in the northern part of the West Bank. By 2005, Israel had completed the withdrawal of its army and the removal of the settlements in the Gaza Strip.

The Court notes that, for the purpose of determining whether a territory remains occupied under international law, the decisive criterion is not whether the occupying Power retains its physical military presence in the territory at all times but rather whether its authority has been established and can be exercised.

Based on the information before it, the Court considers that Israel remained capable of exercising, and continued to exercise, certain key elements of authority over the Gaza Strip, including control of the land, sea and air borders, restrictions on movement of people and goods, collection of import and export taxes, and military control over the buffer zone, despite the withdrawal of its military presence in 2005. This is even more so since 7 October 2023.

In light of the above, the Court is of the view that Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip has not entirely released it of its obligations under the law of occupation. Israel’s obligations have remained commensurate with the degree of its effective control over the Gaza Strip.

Finding a non-retarded Ukrainian challenge: impossible.

Says the guy who claims he does NOT give Hamas every possible support. What a fucking idiot.

It's absolutely correct. The number of Israelis killed is a small fraction, and it has been in every conflict.

What really happened here is: YOU said Hamas wasn't the government in charge on the day Gaza was turned over and thus the people of Gaza

Yes, so it wasn't "turned over to Hamas". Believe me, I had a low opinion of your ilk, but you manage to outdo my expectatons in every single post. (And yet, I still don't think Little Russians should die, just like I hate Islam and yet don't think that Gazans should die.)

Oh? I thought I "knew nothing" and yet you admit I DO know. 😃

Only for as long as it took you to skim and paraphrase some poorly understood paragraphs from Wikipedia.

I did mis-read that comment and edited my response to it. Sorry about that. My initial interpretation was based on your desire to kill all the Jews, just like your heroes, Hamas.

So you choose 'stupid'. Very well. Yet in the same paragraph where you admit that I said that Hamas should be exterminated, you claim that Hamas are my heroes. So I guess it's "stupid and dishonest" both, right? Also, no one buys that you're a defender of Jews. You're literally the ethnic group most implicated in pogroms and death camps.