We have far too many problems to return land ownership to being part of the deal.
Many towns are almost entirely owned by either rich out of state boomers, corporations, or overseas Chinese/Indian/whatever groups. To the point where alternatives are basically non existent if you didn't buy it decades ago (and they likely muscled most of those guys out too), and they can afford to just price raise out any undesirables (or flood it with Section 8s to milk government funding). Almost all of these groups would be Left voting, even if their tenants are entirely Right wing.
Not to mention if we make it a thing, that gives them more motivation than just money to abuse that. Soros alone can afford to buy out half of multiple red states just to remove their votes from mattering, and that's just one of the many NWO Lefties trying to control us. Suddenly it'll be in their best interest to disenfranchise every Red state through sheer money power, not only removing our ability to vote for ourselves but then also outright killing us via real estate exploitation (price out the dirty whites, flood the area with pet immigrants).
It was a great idea when there was nearly infinite land ready for the settling and taking, and it was a mark of a strong man to do so. But now its absolutely going to be used against us unless we solve a lot of other problems first.
If they merely own property, but do not actually live there, then they are not resident land owning voters with stakes in the policies of that land and community
The current system has worked to the benefit of democrats. To simply have nomadic voters, illegal aliens counted in the census, those illegal aliens utilized therefore to assign extra representatives to democrat districts,
My proposal eliminates all welfare housing, section 8 ghetto, apartment rental squatting, condo leasing democrats from being counted as voters.
If they merely own property, but do not actually live there, then they are not resident land owning voters with stakes in the policies of that land and community
They are still taking up land and property that can no longer be accessed by the populace. They are increasing their voting power by literally removing large swaths of their opposition from voting period. Again, an easy move for billionaires or foreign influence to swing entire Red states Blue by buying out entire Red towns with their infinite money and connections. They wouldn't even need the nodamic or illegals anymore, they could just make their own vote count for more by removing millions through sheer power of money.
They could literally turn a town into a fiefdom by selling a single house to a stooge of their choosing to be the only voting capable individual in the local elections. Repeat it across dozens and control counties and even up to entire States.
Your proposal removes one problem and opens another one if we do not solve the issues with our current housing problems beforehand. Its jumping in without consideration of the consequences. We could simply remove the illegals and make government assistance a disqualifier for voting and accomplish much the same without the side effect of disenfranchising just as much of our own side.
I've always said that voting is an earned right -- you're on the right track that it should be those only invested in the future, and Heinlein was right that service should guarantee citizenship.
That's why I said it was a great idea once, and might have been still if we never went away from it, but at the current juncture its only going to make things worse with little truly gained.
We can't look at any problem in a vacuum, all of them need to be dismantled and dealt with in the correct order to truly start to fix things.
We have far too many problems to return land ownership to being part of the deal.
Many towns are almost entirely owned by either rich out of state boomers, corporations, or overseas Chinese/Indian/whatever groups. To the point where alternatives are basically non existent if you didn't buy it decades ago (and they likely muscled most of those guys out too), and they can afford to just price raise out any undesirables (or flood it with Section 8s to milk government funding). Almost all of these groups would be Left voting, even if their tenants are entirely Right wing.
Not to mention if we make it a thing, that gives them more motivation than just money to abuse that. Soros alone can afford to buy out half of multiple red states just to remove their votes from mattering, and that's just one of the many NWO Lefties trying to control us. Suddenly it'll be in their best interest to disenfranchise every Red state through sheer money power, not only removing our ability to vote for ourselves but then also outright killing us via real estate exploitation (price out the dirty whites, flood the area with pet immigrants).
It was a great idea when there was nearly infinite land ready for the settling and taking, and it was a mark of a strong man to do so. But now its absolutely going to be used against us unless we solve a lot of other problems first.
Strictly enforce residency requirement
If they merely own property, but do not actually live there, then they are not resident land owning voters with stakes in the policies of that land and community
The current system has worked to the benefit of democrats. To simply have nomadic voters, illegal aliens counted in the census, those illegal aliens utilized therefore to assign extra representatives to democrat districts,
My proposal eliminates all welfare housing, section 8 ghetto, apartment rental squatting, condo leasing democrats from being counted as voters.
They are still taking up land and property that can no longer be accessed by the populace. They are increasing their voting power by literally removing large swaths of their opposition from voting period. Again, an easy move for billionaires or foreign influence to swing entire Red states Blue by buying out entire Red towns with their infinite money and connections. They wouldn't even need the nodamic or illegals anymore, they could just make their own vote count for more by removing millions through sheer power of money.
They could literally turn a town into a fiefdom by selling a single house to a stooge of their choosing to be the only voting capable individual in the local elections. Repeat it across dozens and control counties and even up to entire States.
Your proposal removes one problem and opens another one if we do not solve the issues with our current housing problems beforehand. Its jumping in without consideration of the consequences. We could simply remove the illegals and make government assistance a disqualifier for voting and accomplish much the same without the side effect of disenfranchising just as much of our own side.
Fair enough. My proposal is bad as long as jews still have monopoly power to print fiat currency and launder it to themselves
I've always said that voting is an earned right -- you're on the right track that it should be those only invested in the future, and Heinlein was right that service should guarantee citizenship.
So the rubric should be: married men who served.
That's why I said it was a great idea once, and might have been still if we never went away from it, but at the current juncture its only going to make things worse with little truly gained.
We can't look at any problem in a vacuum, all of them need to be dismantled and dealt with in the correct order to truly start to fix things.