Yeah, that's my whole point. I'm not against saying the white guy did a FAFO and started the fight (though I seriously doubt whatever he did deserved the lynch mob beat down) so I'm open minded enough to hear the counter arguments which "they" say exist.

But they refuse to say what those counter arguments are. In poker, we call that a bluff!

(Also the teacher getting seriously beaten trying to defend the guy was absolutely inexcusable.)