Epstein was FIRMLY a bipartisan problem, both the left and the right were pointing him out to try and bring down pet targets, and that's YUGE for keeping it in the public eye. That doubles the number of normies wanting to talk about it. When the marching order is "bury it" vs "no you" that's huge.
History is cyclical and nothing ever happens, but it's cyclical in a wind and release cycle. Things later down the line of the wind phase are "tighter" they're more impactful even if they're "less" of a thing in objective reality. The pressure cooker is apt because of this. Sure you might have added MORE heat during a previous event, but it's the threshold thay matters, every bit of heat adds up, and saying "whyd it blow now? I only added a single degree, three days ago I added 10 degrees" misses the physics of it
Your metaphor makes sense in a completely organic environment. Gamergate is probably a perfect example of one of those happening.
This I feel is the furthest from organic, its not only way too big and involving too many big people, but its people whose very power structure is in manipulations like that. In this way, we are just children wandering through the kitchen. Sure we could add heat and do all sorts of things that could "pop" the story, but the person actually cooking is also there and monitoring these things. Including the ability to turn the heat up or down as needed to fit their goals instead.
The longer this goes on, the more I feel like Epstein is a "we allowed you to know" situation that is being used for some purpose. The heat added was them expecting us to add heat.
You give the powers that be way to much credit. Rome fell. The Globohomo will too.
Not in some glorious struggle but because that's the nature of power, secrecy, and evil.
This isn't even claiming pattern, it's claiming nature. The "heat" in this case is how long it takes for someone to put their head on a pike. "Someone" can be anybody. It can be a pure hearted revolutionary or it can be their right hand deciding to rule 2 them and take over. Such things are inevitable, and they always cause a reset.
They will fall one day as all things will, but that doesn't mean they are completely powerless to do something as simple (to them) as social engineering.
The thing that decides if someone finally breaks and puts their head on a pike is a heat that they have considerable control over. Not perfect, not even close, but they can influence it. And there are a lot of heads that need taking if we are to really even make a dent here, which means a lot of "popping."
If you want a metaphor, there's a bucket, uou can't unfill the bucket. Everyone wants to put water in the bucket. Tptb must fill it, sure they have slowed thr flow. They either stop and die or it overflows. Their control isn't particularly meaningful in the grand scheme.
The other thirds of it though are
Epstein was FIRMLY a bipartisan problem, both the left and the right were pointing him out to try and bring down pet targets, and that's YUGE for keeping it in the public eye. That doubles the number of normies wanting to talk about it. When the marching order is "bury it" vs "no you" that's huge.
History is cyclical and nothing ever happens, but it's cyclical in a wind and release cycle. Things later down the line of the wind phase are "tighter" they're more impactful even if they're "less" of a thing in objective reality. The pressure cooker is apt because of this. Sure you might have added MORE heat during a previous event, but it's the threshold thay matters, every bit of heat adds up, and saying "whyd it blow now? I only added a single degree, three days ago I added 10 degrees" misses the physics of it
Your metaphor makes sense in a completely organic environment. Gamergate is probably a perfect example of one of those happening.
This I feel is the furthest from organic, its not only way too big and involving too many big people, but its people whose very power structure is in manipulations like that. In this way, we are just children wandering through the kitchen. Sure we could add heat and do all sorts of things that could "pop" the story, but the person actually cooking is also there and monitoring these things. Including the ability to turn the heat up or down as needed to fit their goals instead.
The longer this goes on, the more I feel like Epstein is a "we allowed you to know" situation that is being used for some purpose. The heat added was them expecting us to add heat.
You give the powers that be way to much credit. Rome fell. The Globohomo will too.
Not in some glorious struggle but because that's the nature of power, secrecy, and evil.
This isn't even claiming pattern, it's claiming nature. The "heat" in this case is how long it takes for someone to put their head on a pike. "Someone" can be anybody. It can be a pure hearted revolutionary or it can be their right hand deciding to rule 2 them and take over. Such things are inevitable, and they always cause a reset.
They will fall one day as all things will, but that doesn't mean they are completely powerless to do something as simple (to them) as social engineering.
The thing that decides if someone finally breaks and puts their head on a pike is a heat that they have considerable control over. Not perfect, not even close, but they can influence it. And there are a lot of heads that need taking if we are to really even make a dent here, which means a lot of "popping."
If you want a metaphor, there's a bucket, uou can't unfill the bucket. Everyone wants to put water in the bucket. Tptb must fill it, sure they have slowed thr flow. They either stop and die or it overflows. Their control isn't particularly meaningful in the grand scheme.