If you don't think it's reasonable to believe that a Queen might rule over a kingdom (since we don't use the term "queendom"), then I don't know what to tell you.
ignorance ... that would be ignorance of the theology we're talking about in the first place.
But that's part of my point. Lots of laymen without deep theological knowledge go to church, right? It's part of why they go. To someone like that, this sort of thing can definitely be deeply misleading, possibly to the point of idolatry. And it's certainly not necessary.
Too many religions, in fact too many things in general are dumbed down for the braindead postmodernist proles already. You lose gravitas and moral legitimacy when you do crap like that.
The answer is no. No no and thrice no.
To someone like that
Someone like that is welcome to go listen to the saxophone and hold hands in an Episcopal "church" with the rest of the theological illiterates.
Crap like what? Not addressing a fellow human as "Queen of Heaven?"
Don't get me wrong, I think that even devout, theologically minded people are in danger of idolatry with behavior like that. But even more so for regular people who want to seek Jesus. Writing them off as "theological illiterates" is... certainly a take.
go listen to the saxophone and hold hands in an Episcopal "church" with the rest of the theological illiterates.
And would those people be saved, if they had repented to Jesus?
Crap like revising perfectly reasonable doctrine under the bad faith premise that idiots might misunderstand it.
You remind me of all those leftoids trying to get people to disavow imaginary nazis, constantly pretending to hear "dog whistles" everywhere they go that have not one thing to do with what anyone else in the room means or says.
are in danger of idolatry
Then you don't understand the concept of idolatry either I suppose. Next you'll tell me that word appears somewhere in the Bible despite having been invented in the 1300s.
If you don't think it's reasonable to believe that a Queen might rule over a kingdom (since we don't use the term "queendom"), then I don't know what to tell you.
But that's part of my point. Lots of laymen without deep theological knowledge go to church, right? It's part of why they go. To someone like that, this sort of thing can definitely be deeply misleading, possibly to the point of idolatry. And it's certainly not necessary.
You still don't get it, apparently.
No.
Too many religions, in fact too many things in general are dumbed down for the braindead postmodernist proles already. You lose gravitas and moral legitimacy when you do crap like that.
The answer is no. No no and thrice no.
Someone like that is welcome to go listen to the saxophone and hold hands in an Episcopal "church" with the rest of the theological illiterates.
Crap like what? Not addressing a fellow human as "Queen of Heaven?"
Don't get me wrong, I think that even devout, theologically minded people are in danger of idolatry with behavior like that. But even more so for regular people who want to seek Jesus. Writing them off as "theological illiterates" is... certainly a take.
And would those people be saved, if they had repented to Jesus?
Crap like revising perfectly reasonable doctrine under the bad faith premise that idiots might misunderstand it.
You remind me of all those leftoids trying to get people to disavow imaginary nazis, constantly pretending to hear "dog whistles" everywhere they go that have not one thing to do with what anyone else in the room means or says.
Then you don't understand the concept of idolatry either I suppose. Next you'll tell me that word appears somewhere in the Bible despite having been invented in the 1300s.
It is not reasonable doctrine to pray the stuff I quoted. It profits you nothing, and it is at best damn close to idolatry, as I originally said.
"Thou shalt have no other gods before me."
"Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, [graven images] nor serve them"
From Exodus 20:3 and 5. Even if the term was made up later, the behavior was described and forbidden all the way back in the day.