The adoptive rate is over a shorter period, but when you square it it gets 26.1%, which is lower than the 34%.
This doesn't make the bottom statement untrue, because it was different time periods and eras and the study it was using might have it somewhere, but you would expect a human to either come to a conclusion based on the stats at hand or choose stats that supported their thesis.
AI slop - but I double checked it with a quick DuckDuckGo search.
Explains the confusing stats.
The adoptive rate is over a shorter period, but when you square it it gets 26.1%, which is lower than the 34%.
This doesn't make the bottom statement untrue, because it was different time periods and eras and the study it was using might have it somewhere, but you would expect a human to either come to a conclusion based on the stats at hand or choose stats that supported their thesis.
https://theuselessweb.site/ducksarethebest.com/