UK PRINCIPLE's ivermectin arm was withheld for 3? years and showed a 15% improvement, less than 1 in a million result was by chance (standard p=0.05 for publishing is 1 in 20). And they designed it to fail by sending the ivermectin in the mail 5-7 days after enrolling whereas big pharma drugs they gave in person after 2 days.
They claimed certain 15% improvement for one of the world's safest medicines 'wasn't worth it' because it didn't meet a threshold they added after the testing was over.
So I already knew HCQ was even better since it was done earlier than ivermectin and withheld longer.
UK PRINCIPLE's ivermectin arm was withheld for 3? years and showed a 15% improvement, less than 1 in a million result was by chance (standard p=0.05 for publishing is 1 in 20). And they designed it to fail by sending the ivermectin in the mail 5-7 days after enrolling whereas big pharma drugs they gave in person after 2 days.
They claimed certain 15% improvement for one of the world's safest medicines 'wasn't worth it' because it didn't meet a threshold they added after the testing was over.
So I already knew HCQ was even better since it was done earlier than ivermectin and withheld longer.