It was less a complaint and more of an observation, as I didn't say pushed in our faces but that it was inserted everywhere.
Jews are a fraction of the population. More than half of America would never know one or know enough about them to have an opinion on them if they weren't so prevalent in our media. And because they are the writers of said media, its them forcing themselves into our awareness.
Problem there being, most of that media is extremely negative. Like you mentioned Mort from Family Guy. But we are goyim are not allowed to repeat those jokes, even if they lack hate behind them, that we literally saw on television without it being a major issue. And regardless of that, when you get that many repeated stereotypes that often, eventually you start to believe it might have some truth. But saying that gets labeled /pol/ nonsense, even if its words they themselves say about themselves.
Oh, I'm pretty sure the in-law thing is pretty universal
I'm from the area of the world where "we built a new house behind our parents house to start our family" is a multigenerational norm, and my wife's family (Northwesterners) are painfully stuck together even after marriage. So maybe its not the Jews responsible for the idea of it (it was mostly a throwaway observation from me), but its not as universal the media they write makes it seem.
When I say that there are a lot of white people who trash whites, they'll say: no, they're all Jews.
I think the problem is they are fighting off decades of being told to not be tribal about themselves and their in group, so they are extremely defensive of "white" and "male" and "Christian" identities while also trying to deal with their extreme paranoia of subversive nonsense, optics fags, and concern trolls trying to trick them. Like their favorite "white when necessary, Jew when necessary" example that is so common.
I'm not saying they aren't in the wrong. But I can see where a lot of them are coming from in doing so, because its a shifty world right now in terms of forming a "white identity movement."
To be fair, I don't have a solution for the problems I diagnose either
Neither do I, but I do try to keep that fact in mind and keep myself humble with it. Including arguing against things I believe in by throwing out the consequences I know would happen and seeing what responses other people have to adapt into my own beliefs.
That's the purpose of devil's advocate isn't it?
But then, Epstein, weapons to Ukraine, bombing Iran, Tulsi selling out, the other great appointments selling out (Patel et al.)
Unfortunately, that was within my expectation too. I gave up on Epstein long ago, just like I gave up on Hillary being arrested, no matter how much we wanted it to happen it was too murky and involved too much power to be done. I doubt Epstein's files even survived the year after they killed him.
Why the big dog and pony show about "we have them on my desk!!!" I still don't know however, because that seems antithetical to any coverup.
But its the same with the rest of what you listed. We were never gonna get a clean break from Ukraine, Trump has always been a pro-Israel guy*, and Tulsi/Bondi/Patel are a woman/Jeet so they were never going to not disappoint eventually.
*Doomers acting like his pro-Jew stuff now is world ending when First Term he literally moved the embassy to Jerusalem against the will of every international body and government. And they still voted for him twice more after that, so clearly it didn't matter until it did for them. Which is why I dismiss them so easily even if they are right in the moment.
It does me no good at all to 'read political content', except as entertainment, which is how I treat it.
Agreed. Nothing any of us say or do really will change a thing. So why stress as if some rando online supporting/opposing X-politician will have actual society effecting ramifications?
It was less a complaint and more of an observation, as I didn't say pushed in our faces but that it was inserted everywhere.
Jews are a fraction of the population. More than half of America would never know one or know enough about them to have an opinion on them if they weren't so prevalent in our media. And because they are the writers of said media, its them forcing themselves into our awareness.
Problem there being, most of that media is extremely negative. Like you mentioned Mort from Family Guy. But we are goyim are not allowed to repeat those jokes, even if they lack hate behind them, that we literally saw on television without it being a major issue. And regardless of that, when you get that many repeated stereotypes that often, eventually you start to believe it might have some truth. But saying that gets labeled /pol/ nonsense, even if its words they themselves say about themselves.
I'm from the area of the world where "we built a new house behind our parents house to start our family" is a multigenerational norm, and my wife's family (Northwesterners) are painfully stuck together even after marriage. So maybe its not the Jews responsible for the idea of it (it was mostly a throwaway observation from me), but its not as universal the media they write makes it seem.
I think the problem is they are fighting off decades of being told to not be tribal about themselves and their in group, so they are extremely defensive of "white" and "male" and "Christian" identities while also trying to deal with their extreme paranoia of subversive nonsense, optics fags, and concern trolls trying to trick them. Like their favorite "white when necessary, Jew when necessary" example that is so common.
I'm not saying they aren't in the wrong. But I can see where a lot of them are coming from in doing so, because its a shifty world right now in terms of forming a "white identity movement."
Neither do I, but I do try to keep that fact in mind and keep myself humble with it. Including arguing against things I believe in by throwing out the consequences I know would happen and seeing what responses other people have to adapt into my own beliefs.
That's the purpose of devil's advocate isn't it?
Unfortunately, that was within my expectation too. I gave up on Epstein long ago, just like I gave up on Hillary being arrested, no matter how much we wanted it to happen it was too murky and involved too much power to be done. I doubt Epstein's files even survived the year after they killed him.
Why the big dog and pony show about "we have them on my desk!!!" I still don't know however, because that seems antithetical to any coverup.
But its the same with the rest of what you listed. We were never gonna get a clean break from Ukraine, Trump has always been a pro-Israel guy*, and Tulsi/Bondi/Patel are a woman/Jeet so they were never going to not disappoint eventually.
*Doomers acting like his pro-Jew stuff now is world ending when First Term he literally moved the embassy to Jerusalem against the will of every international body and government. And they still voted for him twice more after that, so clearly it didn't matter until it did for them. Which is why I dismiss them so easily even if they are right in the moment.
Agreed. Nothing any of us say or do really will change a thing. So why stress as if some rando online supporting/opposing X-politician will have actual society effecting ramifications?