I remember thinking as a small child how the Israel/Palestine conflict should have been resolved already if either side was actually interested in peace.
Well, I guess I can forgive you since you were 5 at the time. But both sides have to want peace for war to end. If one side wants war, there will be war. And the Zionist agenda is the genocide of the natives in "Greater Israel" which is Palestine, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, parts of Egypt, and parts of Saudi Arabia.
Surrendering to the sword at your neck doesn't get peace.
Well, you phrased it unclearly, which is what he was responding to.
You said if either side was interested in peace, it would be over. For the sake of argument, one side could want peace, and the other war...and you'd have war.
You don't need either side interested in peace, you need both sides. As long as even one actor is not behaving in good faith, it's very tricky to negotiate for peace.
Well, I guess I can forgive you since you were 5 at the time. But both sides have to want peace for war to end. If one side wants war, there will be war. And the Zionist agenda is the genocide of the natives in "Greater Israel" which is Palestine, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, parts of Egypt, and parts of Saudi Arabia.
Surrendering to the sword at your neck doesn't get peace.
Uh yeah, I figured that out back then. Way to miss the point.
Well, you phrased it unclearly, which is what he was responding to.
You said if either side was interested in peace, it would be over. For the sake of argument, one side could want peace, and the other war...and you'd have war.
You don't need either side interested in peace, you need both sides. As long as even one actor is not behaving in good faith, it's very tricky to negotiate for peace.
That's fair.