I only heard about it after the recent debacle with that guy.
On the one hand I get where he's (supposedly) coming from when he does the motte argument of 'well it will be a burden on businesses and maybe that means they don't accept a project'. But the bailey of 'so how would you ever get another world of warcraft if (worst case scenario) was law?' is so ridiculous it's worth the backlash.
I do think ultimately there is some part of the 'meta' of live service-ifying games that needs to change. Hopefully this or some similar thing gains some traction.
I only heard about it after the recent debacle with that guy.
On the one hand I get where he's (supposedly) coming from when he does the motte argument of 'well it will be a burden on businesses and maybe that means they don't accept a project'. But the bailey of 'so how would you ever get another world of warcraft if (worst case scenario) was law?' is so ridiculous it's worth the backlash.
I do think ultimately there is some part of the 'meta' of live service-ifying games that needs to change. Hopefully this or some similar thing gains some traction.