You're arguing with a near century old photograph, calling it modern clothing is a hell of a stretch. I think you've got lost in whatever concept you thought up in your head, this is about using native historical precedent as a pretext for invasion.
Pretending the precedent doesn't exist is a dumb, easily disproven move. Contextualising it in "fuck off warmonger pedos, we have an even longer historical context of saying that too" is the right one.
I'm not the one claiming either of those are modern, in fact I've been explicit that I'm talking about historical context. It's not disingenuous to look at history as a whole, and very clearly label which time period you're talking about, rather than being myopically focused on only one period or mislabeling things as modern.
I swear it's like whenever you get half an inkling of something that sounds like a gotcha you latch on like a dog and jump to post some snarky reply before even finishing the thought process and checking it makes sense. Like I said, laziness is habit forming, even in basic logic error checking.
Dude. Who are you? My debate coach? No? Then you can understand why you’re being an obnoxious piece of shit. Especially when you know why they’re different but feel like going but achually and thinking I’m here to learn debate from you.
When you act retarded and have the gall to call someone else a retard, I don't know why you wouldn't expect them to want to rub your nose in it until you start to feel shame for the shit you just deposited on the table.
I don't need your permission to point out why you're being dumb every time you reply, who the fuck are you to think people have to put up with your shit-talking quietly?
You're arguing with a near century old photograph, calling it modern clothing is a hell of a stretch. I think you've got lost in whatever concept you thought up in your head, this is about using native historical precedent as a pretext for invasion.
Pretending the precedent doesn't exist is a dumb, easily disproven move. Contextualising it in "fuck off warmonger pedos, we have an even longer historical context of saying that too" is the right one.
If you think a century is too old but you want to bring up the 12th century in comparison, how disingenuous are you?
The precedent being what? People wore head dresses and loose baggy robes in history? And that's good enough to be compared to modern hijabs
I'm not the one claiming either of those are modern, in fact I've been explicit that I'm talking about historical context. It's not disingenuous to look at history as a whole, and very clearly label which time period you're talking about, rather than being myopically focused on only one period or mislabeling things as modern.
I swear it's like whenever you get half an inkling of something that sounds like a gotcha you latch on like a dog and jump to post some snarky reply before even finishing the thought process and checking it makes sense. Like I said, laziness is habit forming, even in basic logic error checking.
Dude. Who are you? My debate coach? No? Then you can understand why you’re being an obnoxious piece of shit. Especially when you know why they’re different but feel like going but achually and thinking I’m here to learn debate from you.
When you act retarded and have the gall to call someone else a retard, I don't know why you wouldn't expect them to want to rub your nose in it until you start to feel shame for the shit you just deposited on the table.
I don't need your permission to point out why you're being dumb every time you reply, who the fuck are you to think people have to put up with your shit-talking quietly?