Look, I'll be the first person to advocate that men should, by default, be physically competent and fit armed killers with a coterie of like-minded individual, but that advice really isn't going to fix the core of the issue when it comes to dealing with women - that society as a whole pays deference and privilege to them, and being said physically competent and armed killer is fairly worthless when the State comes knocking at your door or you have no arena to demonstrate said aptitude or and lacking in the necessary physical assets needed to start and protect a family.

And if I went any further into that tangent, I'd probably violate a few rules, so CONTINUINIG ON -

Now, if what you're saying is that things are about to get a little crazy and technical and kinetic and men should be prepared for that - that's fine. I get that. I'm a little bit skeptical of this claim, but it's a fair one to make. However, it's going to be a hard sell for most men just based off of recent history. Men react to incentives - we will chase the moon and spit the devil in the eye if the potential reward is good enough - and the current level of incentives on the ground is very, very lacking.

Honestly, I'm not certain which would be worse. That things do continue on it's current trajectory without altercation, or things happen just as you're describing and the majority of men will be caught flat-footed without proper resource. Hmm.

I guess we really should just Pascal's Wager all up in this bitch and be done with it.