No. Deranged muslims getting nuclear material is not allowed. Pound sand.
NPT has nothing to do with the EU. Christ, man. Have some self-respect.
Trumo told them to stop trying, almost a decade ago
"Trumo" talked about a nuclear weapon.
I'm trusting the best president the US has had in a hundred years over wherever you think your news is coming from.
Didn't know Christopher Wray had that many fans left.
Especially when you deny the 2020 election fraud.
You'll talk about anything except how you spread blatant lies about Iran "vowing to use a nuclear weapon to destroy us". Dude, what is this? Why are you so emotionally incontinent? Why can't you address a single point or make a single good point?
I genuinely do not care what a treaty said. They don't have the right to build nuclear weapons. A literal statement that the action you claim they have a right to, they were told not to do, and now face explicit consequences for doing. They fucked around, they found out, and now you're screeing about the US flexing on some dumbfucks that thought they should try to play games about getting a nuke. Much like how the Canadians don't get to fuck us on trade and send fentanyl over our border. Iran has made statements of intent, not blatant "we will use nuclear weapon serial no 244566" but they have made threatening statements, and their leadership is deranged.
No nuclear weapons for deranged people. If it was feasible to remove them from Israel, India, Pakistan, etc I would support that too. You fuck around, you find out exactly how far your "I have the right to develop WMDs" goes.
No, it wasn't. And I don't have to say "I am going to kill you with xyz" for the threat to exist. That level of inability to parse an implication is severely autistic, which you are not.
refuted
You can pretend that all you like, we're still not letting iran have nukes, and there's no amount of whining from countries that don't matter that will chnage that. Iran doesn't have the right to build nukes because the US says so.
OK, so you went from "repeatedly called for violence against us" and then shouting "well, they IMPLIED it". No, they didn't imply a thing. The US, on the other hand, is responsible for mass murder. Thank you for your attention to the matter.
we're still not letting iran have nukes...Iran doesn't have the right to build nukes because the US says so.
Oooooooooh, "the US" said so! I guess that's also why North Korea doesn't have nukes, because your joke of a non-country said so.
Also, like with your lies about what Iran did, you're moving the goalposts here as well. The question was about enrichment. Regardless of what any fentanyl-ridden shithole says, Iran has the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, which is what they were doing.
But with your attack, they'll probably develop nuclear weapons, and they'll be right to do so. Womp womp.
NPT has nothing to do with the EU. Christ, man. Have some self-respect.
"Trumo" talked about a nuclear weapon.
Didn't know Christopher Wray had that many fans left.
You'll talk about anything except how you spread blatant lies about Iran "vowing to use a nuclear weapon to destroy us". Dude, what is this? Why are you so emotionally incontinent? Why can't you address a single point or make a single good point?
I genuinely do not care what a treaty said. They don't have the right to build nuclear weapons. A literal statement that the action you claim they have a right to, they were told not to do, and now face explicit consequences for doing. They fucked around, they found out, and now you're screeing about the US flexing on some dumbfucks that thought they should try to play games about getting a nuke. Much like how the Canadians don't get to fuck us on trade and send fentanyl over our border. Iran has made statements of intent, not blatant "we will use nuclear weapon serial no 244566" but they have made threatening statements, and their leadership is deranged.
No nuclear weapons for deranged people. If it was feasible to remove them from Israel, India, Pakistan, etc I would support that too. You fuck around, you find out exactly how far your "I have the right to develop WMDs" goes.
OK, so you were lying about "they vowed to use nuclear weapons on us".
Good to know.
The rest of your crap was already refuted, Levin Jr.
No, it wasn't. And I don't have to say "I am going to kill you with xyz" for the threat to exist. That level of inability to parse an implication is severely autistic, which you are not.
You can pretend that all you like, we're still not letting iran have nukes, and there's no amount of whining from countries that don't matter that will chnage that. Iran doesn't have the right to build nukes because the US says so.
OK, so you went from "repeatedly called for violence against us" and then shouting "well, they IMPLIED it". No, they didn't imply a thing. The US, on the other hand, is responsible for mass murder. Thank you for your attention to the matter.
Oooooooooh, "the US" said so! I guess that's also why North Korea doesn't have nukes, because your joke of a non-country said so.
Also, like with your lies about what Iran did, you're moving the goalposts here as well. The question was about enrichment. Regardless of what any fentanyl-ridden shithole says, Iran has the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, which is what they were doing.
But with your attack, they'll probably develop nuclear weapons, and they'll be right to do so. Womp womp.