No, it wasn't. And I don't have to say "I am going to kill you with xyz" for the threat to exist. That level of inability to parse an implication is severely autistic, which you are not.
refuted
You can pretend that all you like, we're still not letting iran have nukes, and there's no amount of whining from countries that don't matter that will chnage that. Iran doesn't have the right to build nukes because the US says so.
OK, so you went from "repeatedly called for violence against us" and then shouting "well, they IMPLIED it". No, they didn't imply a thing. The US, on the other hand, is responsible for mass murder. Thank you for your attention to the matter.
we're still not letting iran have nukes...Iran doesn't have the right to build nukes because the US says so.
Oooooooooh, "the US" said so! I guess that's also why North Korea doesn't have nukes, because your joke of a non-country said so.
Also, like with your lies about what Iran did, you're moving the goalposts here as well. The question was about enrichment. Regardless of what any fentanyl-ridden shithole says, Iran has the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, which is what they were doing.
But with your attack, they'll probably develop nuclear weapons, and they'll be right to do so. Womp womp.
OK, so you were lying about "they vowed to use nuclear weapons on us".
Good to know.
The rest of your crap was already refuted, Levin Jr.
No, it wasn't. And I don't have to say "I am going to kill you with xyz" for the threat to exist. That level of inability to parse an implication is severely autistic, which you are not.
You can pretend that all you like, we're still not letting iran have nukes, and there's no amount of whining from countries that don't matter that will chnage that. Iran doesn't have the right to build nukes because the US says so.
OK, so you went from "repeatedly called for violence against us" and then shouting "well, they IMPLIED it". No, they didn't imply a thing. The US, on the other hand, is responsible for mass murder. Thank you for your attention to the matter.
Oooooooooh, "the US" said so! I guess that's also why North Korea doesn't have nukes, because your joke of a non-country said so.
Also, like with your lies about what Iran did, you're moving the goalposts here as well. The question was about enrichment. Regardless of what any fentanyl-ridden shithole says, Iran has the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, which is what they were doing.
But with your attack, they'll probably develop nuclear weapons, and they'll be right to do so. Womp womp.