We're defenseless against those missiles, and Israel turned into a crybaby the second they started to land.
IF Iran was 1/10th the country we've been told they would have used them in an aggressive manner, not just after they've been attacked. Since they've shown they're not willing to start shit for no reason - where does this "we DO need to stop them" come from?
Again, even if they did have them - they're still no threat to the US. That is simply a fact, further backed up by Iran's own actions in not starting shit.
The same can not be said about Israel, right? Again, IF the logic against Iran was correct, it is infinitely more correct in regards to Israel, thankfully for all, there is no logic in the notion.
Non nuclear missiles are an extremely minor threat to the US. We aren't weak or tiny like Israel, and we outmass Iran's conventional firepower by orders of magnitude.
Nukes are several orders of magnitude more threatening than conventional missiles, and don't even need to strike a target directly to do crippling damage to our power infrastructure. Most people haven't realized because of very good cover jobs, but our power infrastructure has been demonstrated to be very vulnerable.
Nuclear proliferation shouldn't be tolerated from a national security standpoint. Especially to hostile nations. If Iran shot a missile at us, they'd do negligible damage and quickly be bombed into the stone age. If they snuck a nuke through the southern border or sent one up to go off in the upper atmosphere, they could cause tens of thousands of dead, and severely damage our electrical grid or our satellite network.
So are Iranian nukes, or really any weapon as long as the US stays out of the region which they have no reason to be in, other than to protect the nation that has attacked as of now 3 or 4 unprovoked directly... but here we are, right?
It isn't how big or bad they are - even the H.S missiles brought Israel down to their knees, but Iran refused to use them until attacked. Re-read that paragraph again if you're not hearing what I am saying.
The claim that Iran can't have this weapon as they'll use it - has been proven false. Why don't you see that simple logic?
Iran totally won't use nukes so it's fine to let homicidal jihadists have a strategic weapon that bypasses typical conventional military capability
really guys believe me the jihadis definitely won't use nukes so just let them have weapons that literally redefined war and don't even need to reach a target to be effective
No. Retarded position. Nuclear proliferation is a failure, and allowing demonstrated lunatics that hate us to get nukes would be an absolute failure for a president.
Let me put this in terms you will understand. If some retard at the end of the block is constantly yelling how he hates you and hopes you die, and he gets a fucking mortar tube set up that he could easily point at your house, allowing that to continue to exist is retarded.
If you truly believe that, then why not start with Israel?
Also, Nukes have arguably been the biggest weapon for peace. Recall prior to it, we had wars every decade. Not really anymore.
Iran, Syria, Libya, North Korea, etc.... all were equal "bad guys", but 1 wasn't fucked with. So, please smarten up.
Again, Iran even if they had the weapons, and even if they wanted to attack the US, just like with Iraq before, it doesn't matter what they want, as they have no method of getting anything here. FFS, again, smarten up.
Someone screaming at you from across the world isn't a threat to you - stop being a coward.
We're defenseless against those missiles, and Israel turned into a crybaby the second they started to land.
IF Iran was 1/10th the country we've been told they would have used them in an aggressive manner, not just after they've been attacked. Since they've shown they're not willing to start shit for no reason - where does this "we DO need to stop them" come from?
Again, even if they did have them - they're still no threat to the US. That is simply a fact, further backed up by Iran's own actions in not starting shit.
The same can not be said about Israel, right? Again, IF the logic against Iran was correct, it is infinitely more correct in regards to Israel, thankfully for all, there is no logic in the notion.
Non nuclear missiles are an extremely minor threat to the US. We aren't weak or tiny like Israel, and we outmass Iran's conventional firepower by orders of magnitude.
Nukes are several orders of magnitude more threatening than conventional missiles, and don't even need to strike a target directly to do crippling damage to our power infrastructure. Most people haven't realized because of very good cover jobs, but our power infrastructure has been demonstrated to be very vulnerable.
Nuclear proliferation shouldn't be tolerated from a national security standpoint. Especially to hostile nations. If Iran shot a missile at us, they'd do negligible damage and quickly be bombed into the stone age. If they snuck a nuke through the southern border or sent one up to go off in the upper atmosphere, they could cause tens of thousands of dead, and severely damage our electrical grid or our satellite network.
So are Iranian nukes, or really any weapon as long as the US stays out of the region which they have no reason to be in, other than to protect the nation that has attacked as of now 3 or 4 unprovoked directly... but here we are, right?
It isn't how big or bad they are - even the H.S missiles brought Israel down to their knees, but Iran refused to use them until attacked. Re-read that paragraph again if you're not hearing what I am saying.
The claim that Iran can't have this weapon as they'll use it - has been proven false. Why don't you see that simple logic?
No. Retarded position. Nuclear proliferation is a failure, and allowing demonstrated lunatics that hate us to get nukes would be an absolute failure for a president.
Let me put this in terms you will understand. If some retard at the end of the block is constantly yelling how he hates you and hopes you die, and he gets a fucking mortar tube set up that he could easily point at your house, allowing that to continue to exist is retarded.
If you truly believe that, then why not start with Israel?
Also, Nukes have arguably been the biggest weapon for peace. Recall prior to it, we had wars every decade. Not really anymore.
Iran, Syria, Libya, North Korea, etc.... all were equal "bad guys", but 1 wasn't fucked with. So, please smarten up.
Again, Iran even if they had the weapons, and even if they wanted to attack the US, just like with Iraq before, it doesn't matter what they want, as they have no method of getting anything here. FFS, again, smarten up.
Someone screaming at you from across the world isn't a threat to you - stop being a coward.