Even the dumbest AI is smarter than Indians. We have support services for our drivers, and the Spanish option is light-years above the English option. The English option is always Indians, and they never know how to do anything. As the joke goes, I would take a million illegal Mexicans over a million legal Indians any day... But I would take neither if I could help it.
I hate the idea of "reputable sources" and our current fascination with them. Facts should stand or fall based on whether they logically fit with reality or not. All information sources should be considered suspect and their claims taken with a grain of salt without some method of verifiability. Unfortunately when it comes to LLMs, or the kinds of human NPCs who edit wikipedia and listen to mainstream media, they have no reasoning skills, so there's no way to rate "truthiness" of a fact without applying some kind of Authoritative Reputation score to sources. Fox News Bad, CNN Good. Alex Jones Bad, Young Turks Good. So in Elon's futile quest to pretend that a chatbot can and should be a source of "maximal truth" there isn't much else he can do but override whatever bias was built into the model and will still be in there somewhere no matter how many overrides you apply.
Grading news sources is certainly the next step for Gamergate
Let toilet twaddle be recognised for what it is and all these 'serious' thinkers who can't get a job thinking seriously think seriously about their careers.
First in the trash are CNN, Fox, BBC and The Guardian.
Your title reminds me of the AI scandal where it turned out that people thought they were using AI but it was actually them talking to indians.
Even the dumbest AI is smarter than Indians. We have support services for our drivers, and the Spanish option is light-years above the English option. The English option is always Indians, and they never know how to do anything. As the joke goes, I would take a million illegal Mexicans over a million legal Indians any day... But I would take neither if I could help it.
I hate the idea of "reputable sources" and our current fascination with them. Facts should stand or fall based on whether they logically fit with reality or not. All information sources should be considered suspect and their claims taken with a grain of salt without some method of verifiability. Unfortunately when it comes to LLMs, or the kinds of human NPCs who edit wikipedia and listen to mainstream media, they have no reasoning skills, so there's no way to rate "truthiness" of a fact without applying some kind of Authoritative Reputation score to sources. Fox News Bad, CNN Good. Alex Jones Bad, Young Turks Good. So in Elon's futile quest to pretend that a chatbot can and should be a source of "maximal truth" there isn't much else he can do but override whatever bias was built into the model and will still be in there somewhere no matter how many overrides you apply.
Grading news sources is certainly the next step for Gamergate
Let toilet twaddle be recognised for what it is and all these 'serious' thinkers who can't get a job thinking seriously think seriously about their careers.
First in the trash are CNN, Fox, BBC and The Guardian.
Huff Po for cleaning up around the edges :)