The key difference here, dimwit, is that there's no pope. She has no power. Most people in protestant churches likely have no idea who that delusional woman is. There is no protestant heirarchy, and what she says has no authority over any other church.
Much like how the US government was originally built to decentralize power, the rejection of the catholic church was a rejection of centralized power. Unlike the pope, who claims to speak for god and has the authority to excommunicate people from the catholic organization.
All you demonstrated is that you have no idea how protestants actually differ from catholics.
She is a political goblin masquerading as religious. She has no power over the tens of millions of protestants, she has no authority over the millions of churches. She may be a political advisor but if she walked into a random church and started giving orders she would be mocked and ignored. Where the pope would be worshipped and obeyed.
There is a massive difference, and I was clearly speaking about authority over the religion, of which she has none. But you aren't interested in fact, which is why you tried to twist it into a separate claim. Or you're just retarded.
The key difference here, dimwit, is that there's no pope. She has no power. Most people in protestant churches likely have no idea who that delusional woman is. There is no protestant heirarchy, and what she says has no authority over any other church.
Much like how the US government was originally built to decentralize power, the rejection of the catholic church was a rejection of centralized power. Unlike the pope, who claims to speak for god and has the authority to excommunicate people from the catholic organization.
All you demonstrated is that you have no idea how protestants actually differ from catholics.
She definitely has power. She works with the White House and has an audience that believes her bullshit.
She is a political goblin masquerading as religious. She has no power over the tens of millions of protestants, she has no authority over the millions of churches. She may be a political advisor but if she walked into a random church and started giving orders she would be mocked and ignored. Where the pope would be worshipped and obeyed.
There is a massive difference, and I was clearly speaking about authority over the religion, of which she has none. But you aren't interested in fact, which is why you tried to twist it into a separate claim. Or you're just retarded.
People listen to her and others like her. That's power.